Social Ethics

Elsbernd, Mary

doi:10.1177/004056390506600107

Cited by 8 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Daloz, Parks, Keen & Keen, 1996), la categoría de bien común se constituye en un puente para que un teólogo moral pueda llevar a cabo un diálogo público en el que hable desde la moral social. Como anota Elsbernd (2005), la ética social incorpora fuentes de las ciencias económicas, políticas, ambientales y sociales, así como de las ciencias teológicas, que incluye la espiritualidad. Esto ha hecho que se gane credibilidad y se reconozcan las competencias y la legitimidad de la interlocución, del discurso y del análisis de la ética social.…”

Section: La Importancia De Bien Común: Categoría De Análisisunclassified

El bien común en la esfera de la teología, la ética y la moral social

Matallana

González

2018

Albertus Magnus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artículo busca explicitar la noción de bien común desde los desarrollos de la ética social como instrumento para el teólogo moral, que intenta establecer la relación entre la fe y la vida pública. En la arena de la discusión pública y de la teología moral, se develan profundas relaciones entre los documentos eclesiales, el Evangelio y las ciencias humanas. Estos diálogos pueden ser puestos al servicio del mundo actual, en una perspectiva ética, de respeto y de construcción de soluciones comunes.

show abstract

Section: La Importancia De Bien Común: Categoría De Análisisunclassified

El bien común en la esfera de la teología, la ética y la moral social

Matallana

González

2018

Albertus Magnus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…principal, mentor, inspector) may have differing ideas about what is “good”, leading to questions of whose viewpoint should be accepted. This ethical dilemma is difficult, as people must be persuaded to sacrifice some of their freedom, goals, and self‐interest, for the sake of the “common good” (Elsbernd, 2005). In this case, mentors may find themselves forced to make decisions against their conscience, with the attending moral consequences in their dealing with multiple and sometimes contradictory demands by different people in school (Kelchtermans, 1996).…”

Section: Ethical Dilemmas In Mentoringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mentors' ethical perceptions: implications for practice

Shapira‐Lishchinsky

2012

Journal of Educational Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study attempts to describe mentors' perceptions of their ethical dilemmas, the derived mentor roles, and the ethical guidelines suggested by mentors, with reference to previous studies exploring the mentors' multifaceted roles.Design/methodology/approachA total of 60 mentors participated in a two‐phase study: the mentors were asked to submit descriptions of their ethical dilemmas to the study web site, and submissions were then discussed in focus groups. A four‐stage coding process derived from grounded theory was utilized.FindingsThe findings were grouped by means of the ATLAS.ti 5.0 into five main categories: discretion, caring, accountability, autonomy, and distributive justice. The findings raise three important issues: first, mentors perceive their role mainly as empowering their mentees and perceive their powerlessness as being due to lack of tools for dealing with ethical dilemmas. Second, most mentors' ethical dilemmas involved conflicts with school principals. Third, a large number of mentor roles and several of the derived ethical guidelines are unique to the mentoring situation.Practical implicationsThe findings may promote the design of an educational program for mentors that will relate to the ethical aspects of mentoring. Such programs call for the participation of school principals in program development and meetings to help mentors deal with their ethical dilemmas.Originality/valueWhile previous studies in mentoring focused on defining mentoring, describing mentors' roles, and suggesting how to build effective mentoring, no study focused on the ethical aspects of mentoring. This study describes mentors' ethical dilemmas, and the unique ethical guidelines that emerged.

show abstract

“…Most Americans view society as comprised of autonomous individuals who have the freedom to pursue their own goals and interests without interference from others. In this individualistic culture it is difficult, if not impossible, to convince people that they should sacrifice some of their freedom, goals, and self-interest, for the sake of the "common good" (Elsbernd, 2005).…”

Section: Discoverymentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategic Collaboration for Ethical Leadership: A Mentoring Framework for Business and Organizational Decision Making

Ncube

Wasburn

2006

Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent corporate scandals in the U.S. have shaken the public trust and spurred the creation of a host of new regulatory controls and laws to help ensure compliance with ethical standards. The purpose of this paper is to present an innovative and practical model for resolving the complexity of making ethical decisions in the contemporary business environment. The paper presents Strategic Collaboration for Ethical Decision Making, a mentoring framework for organizations. The framework provides a process for making ethical decisions. A case study approach is employed to gain insight into the application of the framework. The effectiveness of the framework is assessed using an innovative technique called Empowerment Evaluation.

show abstract

Social Ethics

Cited by 8 publications

References 8 publications

El bien común en la esfera de la teología, la ética y la moral social

El bien común en la esfera de la teología, la ética y la moral social

Mentors' ethical perceptions: implications for practice

Strategic Collaboration for Ethical Leadership: A Mentoring Framework for Business and Organizational Decision Making

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About