2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00040-015-0435-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social evolution and casteless societies: needs for new terminology and a new evolutionary focus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Euglossini however do not exhibit eusocial species but are rather primitively eusocial with overlapping generation, subordination but lacks non-reproductive workers (Kocher & Paxton, 2014). In communal Euglossini species, as it was described previously Cameron 2004;Otero et al 2008), individuals share the same nest cavity with no interaction or alloparental care between the nestmates (da Silva et al, 2016;Dew et al, 2016). Yet primitively eusocial orchid bee species show overlapping generations, some division of labour, dominance behaviour, offspring control through oophagy (Cocom-Pech et al, 2008;Augusto & Garofalo, 2009; and may present subordinate female specialization in guarding the nest entrance (Boff et al, 2015).…”
Section: Research Article -Beesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Euglossini however do not exhibit eusocial species but are rather primitively eusocial with overlapping generation, subordination but lacks non-reproductive workers (Kocher & Paxton, 2014). In communal Euglossini species, as it was described previously Cameron 2004;Otero et al 2008), individuals share the same nest cavity with no interaction or alloparental care between the nestmates (da Silva et al, 2016;Dew et al, 2016). Yet primitively eusocial orchid bee species show overlapping generations, some division of labour, dominance behaviour, offspring control through oophagy (Cocom-Pech et al, 2008;Augusto & Garofalo, 2009; and may present subordinate female specialization in guarding the nest entrance (Boff et al, 2015).…”
Section: Research Article -Beesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the applicability of one term (i.e. caste) to describe societal coordination across all species has been questioned and much of the terminology surrounding castes remains misleading [1,9,[13][14][15].…”
Section: Defining Caste and Why It Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, without detailed knowledge of the plasticity of castes in a species, this definition is of limited practical use. Moreover, does this mean that species without developmentally determined roles lack 'real castes' [13]? We require a set of traits that are readily quantifiable in order to accurately describe castes, and use this to categorise a species in relation to its level in the evolution of social complexity.…”
Section: Defining Caste and Why It Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the nesting biology for the two species in our study has not been described, there are currently no known eusocial species of Nomiinae, and roughly half of the nomiine species studied to date are thought to be social (reviewed by Michener 1969;Michener 2007;Wcislo & Engel 1996), with casteless social organisation in some lineages (as defined by Dew et al (2016)), and only two species showing potential for semisocial organisation (Batra 1966). Although the nesting biology for the two species in our study has not been described, there are currently no known eusocial species of Nomiinae, and roughly half of the nomiine species studied to date are thought to be social (reviewed by Michener 1969;Michener 2007;Wcislo & Engel 1996), with casteless social organisation in some lineages (as defined by Dew et al (2016)), and only two species showing potential for semisocial organisation (Batra 1966).…”
Section: Study Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bees from the halictid subfamily Nomiinae are typically ground nesting. Although the nesting biology for the two species in our study has not been described, there are currently no known eusocial species of Nomiinae, and roughly half of the nomiine species studied to date are thought to be social (reviewed by Michener 1969;Michener 2007;Wcislo & Engel 1996), with casteless social organisation in some lineages (as defined by Dew et al (2016)), and only two species showing potential for semisocial organisation (Batra 1966).…”
Section: Study Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%