1973
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(73)90035-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social facilitation of laughter in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
1
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an interesting finding, which, at first sight, seems to be incompatible with expectations based on the age theory [19] that younger children are more expressive than older ones, though it is consistent with the outcome of the work by [20] that girls are more expressive in showing their emotions than boys. This result is also in line with another study where it was shown that females were more expressive in the presence of a friend than in the presence of stranger [4].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…This is an interesting finding, which, at first sight, seems to be incompatible with expectations based on the age theory [19] that younger children are more expressive than older ones, though it is consistent with the outcome of the work by [20] that girls are more expressive in showing their emotions than boys. This result is also in line with another study where it was shown that females were more expressive in the presence of a friend than in the presence of stranger [4].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Other research shows that people adjust the display of affect behaviors in relation to social situational factors, such as the perceived social status, group size, familiarity, and relationship history of audience members (e.g., Chapman, 1973;Fridlund, 1991;Kraut and Johnston, 1979). Several studies, for example, have shown that people increase the display of externalizing behaviors (e.g., aggression) and overall capacity cues (e.g., expressed confidence) in larger group settings, and instead increase the expression of internalizing behaviors (e.g., sadness and worrying) and overall trustworthiness cues (e.g., expressed compassion) in more intimate (e.g., dyadic) social settings (Benenson et al, 2002;LaFrance, Hecht, and Paluck, 2003;Leaper and Smith, 2004;Vingerhoets, Cornelius, Van Heck, and Becht, 2000).…”
Section: The Socio-relational Framework Of Expressive Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the degree to which the sociality of a particular situation may impact on gender differences in expressivity has not yet been directly studied. Interestingly, in the few studies in which researchers have manipulated social context and included both male and female participants, the sociality of the situation did not differentially affect the expressive behavior of either adult men and women (Fridlund, 1990;Fridlund, Kenworthy, & Jaffey, 1992) or younger boys and girls (Chapman, 1973;Yarczower & Daruns, 1982). Nonetheless, as a first step toward understanding whether men and women differ in the expressive, experiential, and physiological components of emotion, we chose to use a minimally social situation to study responses more closely linked to one emotional stimulus rather than to multiple stimuli.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%