Social goals versus business necessity: The nature and determinants of innovation in nancial inclusion

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to explore the extent to which social innovation is prioritised among a sample of organisations promoting financial inclusion through the provision of affordable credit, advice and financial education. Additionally, we seek to understand the nature of the adopted innovation process and how this is perceived as influencing social change (if at all). Methodology: This exploratory study uses a combination of qualitative, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with 35 managers in 29 different organisations and three focus groups with 16 practitioners and stakeholders.Findings: Innovation processes are in the main, largely incremental as opposed to radical with organisations focusing on process-led innovations. More notably, most organisations found that they often lacked the required social capital capacity, economic and technological resources and the necessary skills to develop, implement and capitalise on innovations, thus limiting the more radical forms of innovations.Implications: To enhance the capacity of smaller organisations promoting financial inclusion, there is significant potential to engage in more open, co-creational projects/partnerships to deliver greater social impact to vulnerable populations.Contribution: We contribute to the under-researched literature on social innovation by highlighting the extent to which social innovation is given precedence within the sector promoting financial inclusion. Given the contextual and organisational diversity of the sector, highlighting these behavioural practices and circumstances, enable researchers to theoretically advance social innovation theory further and provide more practice-based guidance for organisations to successfully shape social change.

The impact of COVID-19 on UK community finance institutions – Implications for local economic development

“…First, the intensification of the move to online service provision and the closure of branches may reduce access to services for the most financially excluded, who often operate in cash. Existing research indicates that providers struggle to serve the most excluded groups more prone to using cash through remote channels (Vik et al, 2021). Compared with face-to-face, manual underwriting, providers using online channels tend to serve more men, more in employment and with higher incomes (Dayson et al, 2020).…”