2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social groups and CO2 emissions in Spanish households

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to the results obtained by other papers for Spain (see e.g. Labandeira and Labeaga 1999) and is in line with the emission intensity by income groups in Spain, as shown by Duarte, Mainar, and Sanchez-Choliz (2012). LAP taxes tend to be more regressive because they largely affect goods that are consumed by low-income households, such as electricity and food.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This is similar to the results obtained by other papers for Spain (see e.g. Labandeira and Labeaga 1999) and is in line with the emission intensity by income groups in Spain, as shown by Duarte, Mainar, and Sanchez-Choliz (2012). LAP taxes tend to be more regressive because they largely affect goods that are consumed by low-income households, such as electricity and food.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…; Jones and Kammen ); and for Spain by Duarte et al. []). For this purpose, information about household consumption (boldĈi) according to different characteristics i (i.e., income levels, region) is required, which is decomposed into the diagonalized vector of domestic household consumption with the different characteristics i (in our case, eight different levels of income) of the region r (boldĈnormali rr ) and the diagonalized vector of imported goods from region s (boldĈnormali sr ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Although elasticities range a great deal depending on studies: 0.25 in north China (Liu et al, 2013) and 0.6 in the UK (Büchs and Schnepf, 2013). 9 In the identified studies, expenditure elasticities range from 0.84 to 0.94 for GHG emissions (Kerkhof et al, 2009;Girod and De Haan, 2010;Duarte et al, 2012;Roca, Serrano, 2007), from 0.64 to 1 for energy consumption (Lenzen et al, 2006), from 0.86 to 0.96 for acidifiant gases (Kerkhof et al, 2009;Roca and Serrano, 2007), and from 0.71 to 0.81 for eutrophicant pollutants (Kerkhof et al, 2009;Roca and Serrano, 2007). We can note a 1.42 expenditure elasticity level for smog-forming pollutants in the case of The Netherlands, which shows the necessity to conduct separate analyses for different pollutants (Kerkhof et al, 2009).…”
Section: Contribution Of Holistic Approaches: the Role Of Social Normsmentioning
confidence: 98%