2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social hierarchy and feed supplementation of heifers: Line or piles?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within cattle herds, social status influences access to resources such as water ( Coimbra et al, 2012 ) and food ( Bica et al, 2019 ), suggesting a strong link between social skills and welfare ( Estevez et al, 2007 ). Under natural conditions, calves live in complex social groups ( Whalin et al, 2021 ), but on many dairy farms, particularly in North America, preweaning calves are housed individually ( USDA, 2016 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within cattle herds, social status influences access to resources such as water ( Coimbra et al, 2012 ) and food ( Bica et al, 2019 ), suggesting a strong link between social skills and welfare ( Estevez et al, 2007 ). Under natural conditions, calves live in complex social groups ( Whalin et al, 2021 ), but on many dairy farms, particularly in North America, preweaning calves are housed individually ( USDA, 2016 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the fact that the higher ranked heifers spent more time under the trees plus shade cloth area compared to the tree shaded area (and low ranked heifers spent more time in the treed area) suggests that there were aspects of the trees plus shade cloth microenvironment that were important to the high ranked heifers. High ranking individuals have been shown to have priority access to resources over low ranking individuals [ 30 , 31 ]. Schütz et al [ 32 ] concluded that dairy cows have preferences for shade that offers greater protection against solar radiation in the summer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the Kondo and Hurnik [14] method considers all competition than an animal was involved (i.e., as actor or reactor) in relation to other herd members, without ponderations. Other authors also preferred this index for similar reason [11,12,[22][23][24]. To our knowledge, socialh is the first R package that adopted the method proposed by Kondo and Hurnik [14].…”
Section: Replacement Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, sensors have been shown to be useful for monitoring the cows’ location [ 1 ], activities (e.g., walking [ 2 , 3 ]; lying down [ 4 , 5 ]), and feeding and drinking behaviour (time and duration [ 6 , 7 ]). Furthermore, electronic feeders and drinkers are also useful for detecting social competition [ 8 10 ] since most disputes occur during feed time [ 11 , 12 ] and at drinkers on hot days [ 13 ]. With the data from electronic bins is possible to define a competition; once an animal (the actor) takes the place of the previous animal (reactor) at the bin [ 8 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%