2012
DOI: 10.1177/0042098012462611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Housing in England: Testing the Logics of Reform

Abstract: The role and function of social housing in England are being recast. A radical programme of reform is being pursued in response to the apparent failure of the sector to serve as an effective welfare service, promoting dependency rather than social mobility. This paper examines the underlying logics and considers some of the potential consequences of this reform agenda, through an exploration of the relationship between social housing and worklessness. Drawing on evidence from qualitative interviews with over 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Not only are social renters on the wrong side of Gurney's three discourses, but they are also perceived as being dependent on the state (e.g. Robinson, 2013).…”
Section: Home-ownership As a Social Normmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only are social renters on the wrong side of Gurney's three discourses, but they are also perceived as being dependent on the state (e.g. Robinson, 2013).…”
Section: Home-ownership As a Social Normmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. will increasingly q 2013 Taylor & Francis serve as short-term respite provision for all but the most vulnerable of households' (Robinson, 2012). Or, as contended by Bradley (2011), it is a move that will eliminate the distinction between social and private renting in terms of tenancy rights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anot šių šalininkų, socialinio būsto priemonė ja besinaudojančius asmenis įtrau-kia į nuolatinės priklausomybės ciklą, taip sumažindama jų galimybes ir gebėjimus prisiimti asmeninę atsakomybę už savo situaciją (Greenhalgh, Moss 2009). Todėl paramos socialiniu būstu priemonės vertinamos ir kaip socialinės atskirties mechanizmas (Robinson 2013).…”
Section: įVadasunclassified