2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social impacts evaluation and insider-outsider paradigm: Floodwater spreading project on the Gareh-Bygone plain as an illustrative case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interest in research that generates social benefits in turn motivates the search for a system of evaluation of science that detects its social impact (Lauronen, 2020). This evaluation is understood as the tool that identifies the social consequences of planned interventions produced after the development of research (Vanclay, 2003; Ahmadvand & Karami, 2017). Funding agencies are the main stakeholders in this evaluation, as they seek to justify how money spent on research improves people's lives (Holbrook & Frodeman, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interest in research that generates social benefits in turn motivates the search for a system of evaluation of science that detects its social impact (Lauronen, 2020). This evaluation is understood as the tool that identifies the social consequences of planned interventions produced after the development of research (Vanclay, 2003; Ahmadvand & Karami, 2017). Funding agencies are the main stakeholders in this evaluation, as they seek to justify how money spent on research improves people's lives (Holbrook & Frodeman, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the evaluation of social impact, understood as “the process of identifying the future consequences of a current or proposed actions, which are related to individuals, organisations and social macro-systems” (Becker, 2001), is still under development. Evaluation is, in this context, a tool for understanding the societal consequences of scientific research and aids decision-making by managers, funders and society as a whole (Ahmadvand and Karami, 2017; Vanclay et al, 2015). Since funding agencies seek to ensure that funded projects clearly identify societal benefits (Holbrook and Frodeman, 2011) but lack valid measurement systems, it is the researcher’s responsibility to demonstrate the social impact of their work (Sordé, et al, 2020) and make it visible (Lauronen, 2020), rather than assume that this communication and impact occur by default (Wilsdon et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%