Achieving Equity and Quality in Higher Education 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78316-1_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Inclusion or Social Engineering? The Politics and Reality of Widening Access to Medicine in the UK

Abstract: Although driven by policy and investment, the available data suggests that, to date, UK efforts to minimise the barriers into professions such as medicine have had mixed success.We explore the myriad social, individual and structural reasons why the resources invested in widening access (WA) activities have not significantly increased the representation of applicants from lower socio-economic groups within medical schools. We discuss the different discourses of widening access/increasing diversity in the UK co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Structural barriers may help explain why applications from those in lower socio‐economic groups have not risen significantly over the last decade despite changes in WA policy and practices, and attitudes. The alignment of medical school systems, education policies, market pressures and other stakeholders is required to address this barrier …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Structural barriers may help explain why applications from those in lower socio‐economic groups have not risen significantly over the last decade despite changes in WA policy and practices, and attitudes. The alignment of medical school systems, education policies, market pressures and other stakeholders is required to address this barrier …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alignment of medical school systems, education policies, market pressures and other stakeholders is required to address this barrier. 73,74 The substantial demographic diversity within the participant group enabled us to include a breadth of views from participants living in very different contexts and cultures and attending different schools. The disproportionate number of female participants may be because girls tend to perform better at high school 75 and are more likely to apply for medicine.…”
Section: Perceived 'Fit' With Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also highlights these teachers' prioritisation of pupils making their own choice of career. We suggest that the expectation for teachers in WA schools to advocate medicine cannot happen in isolation and instead that this requires the support of other stakeholders, policies and systems aligning to provide their pupils with opportunities to develop their capability, as well as better chances of actually achieving a place (Alexander and Cleland 2018;Gorman 2018). Acknowledging and understanding teachers' concerns and working with them to construct better partnerships and a more positive view of the journey to medicine, might be a tangible start (Greany et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The fairy-tale endings of the initial texts evoke the social mobility discourse, which reflects that a university education breaks ‘the transmission of disadvantage from one generation to the next’ (p.231), 44 and is commonly promoted as the main purpose and benefit of widening participation in medicine in the UK. 19 45 46 While HE does enable social mobility for many students, 45 47 when presented alongside a deficit discourse, the social mobility narrative can reinforce perceptions that by attending university, under-represented students move from being ‘not good enough’ to being ‘more like the advantaged’ (p.11) 46 and in alignment with middle class values. 18 48 The university is cast as the gracious patron who grants these students a golden opportunity to achieve ‘better jobs’ and to ‘better myself’ (p.564).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%