2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-018-1874-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Indicators to Explain Response in Longitudinal Studies

Abstract: Economic and social studies use longitudinal panels to estimate change in variables and aggregates of interest. Attrition in such studies may threaten the validity of the estimates from the panels. This study deepens the knowledge on attrition making reference to three waves of the UK Household Longitudinal Study. While traditionally participation behaviour in panel surveys has been mostly studied with reference to socio-demographic variables and not distinguishing different components of the response process,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has identified paradata [74][75][76] and Big Five personality traits [62,[77][78][79] as predictors of panel attrition. These variables could also interact with the mode design indicator.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has identified paradata [74][75][76] and Big Five personality traits [62,[77][78][79] as predictors of panel attrition. These variables could also interact with the mode design indicator.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much has been learned about predictors of participation in health and broader research studies in general, suggesting that a wide range of sociodemographic, individual, and social and situational characteristics may be related to participation and attrition [13][14][15]; however, despite the potential value of information on predictors of participation in EMA studies, there has been very little research on this topic specifically. It is important to illuminate predictors of participation in EMA studies as a specific type of research design as it possesses some unique characteristics, including its reliance on the use of smartphone-based technologies, the prolonged and intensive data collection schedule, and the collection of data in the flow of people's daily lives.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that participation willingness could be overall only weakly predicted from sociodemographic, health, and behavior-related respondent characteristics suggests that there are other factors to consider alongside these to improve the prediction of participation propensity. Although previous studies have suggested that participation in research may be predicted by a range of sociodemographic, individual, and situational factors [13,15,66], the available evidence base primarily relates to traditional survey methods, and it is not clear how well this generalizes to EMA studies. Additional predictors to consider for EMA research participation willingness could include factors such as how much and in what ways individuals use and engage with their smartphones, work or life schedules (eg, some occupations may preclude the ability to respond to EMA prompts during the working day), and markers of interest in the specific topic of the EMA study.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%