2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social inequality deeply affects people’s perception of ecosystem services and disservices provided by street trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monetary values of ecosystem services provided by trees, in different floristic composition scenarios (Table 3), are influenced by both number of trees and selected species' size. These values are important to show the benefits provided by trees to both public managers and the overall population, as well as their potential as public assets to help promoting quality of life, rather than just implementation and maintenance costs (CHEN;NI;ZHANG et al, 2020;PISTÓN;SILVA FILHO;DIAS, 2022;SUCHOCKA;HECIAK;BLASZCZYK;ADAMCZYK et al, 2023).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monetary values of ecosystem services provided by trees, in different floristic composition scenarios (Table 3), are influenced by both number of trees and selected species' size. These values are important to show the benefits provided by trees to both public managers and the overall population, as well as their potential as public assets to help promoting quality of life, rather than just implementation and maintenance costs (CHEN;NI;ZHANG et al, 2020;PISTÓN;SILVA FILHO;DIAS, 2022;SUCHOCKA;HECIAK;BLASZCZYK;ADAMCZYK et al, 2023).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socioeconomic factors play a significant role in people's attitudes towards and willingness to establish and maintain trees in both rural and urban settings (Table 6). However, the distribution and density of trees in these areas can vary due to these factors (Blanco et al, 2020;Collins et al, 2019;Danquah et al, 2023;Graça et al, 2018;Hanisah et al, 2012;Koyata et al, 2021;Pistón et al, 2022;Suchocka et al, 2019). Understanding the relationship between socioeconomic aspects and the spatial distribution of trees is crucial for comprehending the dynamics of green infrastructure and its role in the spatial ecology of other species.…”
Section: Relationship Between Socio-economic Status and The Spatial D...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, more research has been conducted in major cities, leaving a gap in the literature concerning small towns and cities, especially in developing and undeveloped countries. (Abdulmalik et al, 2020;Arabomen et al, 2021;Collins et al, 2019;Deng et al, 2017;Gwedla et al, 2022;Koyata et al, 2021;Lin et al, 2021;Pistón et al, 2022;Suchocka et al, 2019) Old age creates a negative attitude towards trees; hence, less trees in the residences of older residents Negative (Danquah et al, 2023;Fernandes et al, 2018;Jeong et al, 2023) Gender Gender differences influence people's attitudes, perceptions, and willingness to establish and retain trees.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The traditional knowledge associated with plants is the basis for the specific consideration and devotion expressed by the riparian's, who find their account there. In addition to this demand for empirical or even bookish knowledge, the impoverishment of the majority of city dwellers is one of the determining factors in the choice of trees for urban development [23,43,70,79,80]. Indeed, urban forestry, and in particular street trees, are the basis of the socio-ecological and landscape values that govern the preferences of the actors [79,[81][82][83].…”
Section: Influence Of Ecosystem Services On Phytodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%