2008
DOI: 10.1016/s0968-8080(08)32410-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social inequality in Pap smear coverage: identifying under-users of cervical cancer screening in Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
36
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with previous findings, our results point to a high degree of screening inequality in southern and eastern Europe and the Americas (Todorova et al 2009;Palencia et al 2010;Arrossi et al 2008). We extend the results of a previous cross-country comparison of cervical screening that used the WHS data in two important ways (Gakidou et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In line with previous findings, our results point to a high degree of screening inequality in southern and eastern Europe and the Americas (Todorova et al 2009;Palencia et al 2010;Arrossi et al 2008). We extend the results of a previous cross-country comparison of cervical screening that used the WHS data in two important ways (Gakidou et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For the decomposition analysis, we examined variables that have been found to be associated with both cervical screening and permanent income: age, education level, marital status, and urbanicity (Palencia et al 2010;Akers et al 2007;Arrossi et al 2008;Leyden et al 2005;Albuquerque et al 2009). We also included a variable indicating whether or not the woman reported needing health care for herself or her child within the past year (Winkler et al 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 Studies have reported the age of the client, level of knowledge about the procedure, sociocultural characteristics and staff attitude at screening centres as factors that can influence the uptake of cervical cancer screening and colposcopy services. 5,6,7 However, majority of these studies investigated clinical outcomes usually from the perception of the service provider. Indeed, limited studies have reported physical after effects like vaginal bleeding, pain and vaginal discharge following cervical biopsy performed during colposcopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La probabilidad de desarrollar este tipo de tumor se encuentra estrechamente relacionada con la participación de las mujeres en el tamizaje. En Argentina, el acceso al tamizaje de las mujeres socialmente más vulnerables se ha visto limitado por la existencia de barreras geográficas, culturales, sociales y vinculadas a la organización de los servicios de salud 2,3,4 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified