Social influence and the invocation of rights: The effects of accountability, reputation and political skill on legal claiming

Abstract

Issues relating to litigation and other forms of employee legal claiming are at the forefront of the practice of human resource management. However, organizational scholars have paid scant attention to this important aspect of organizational life. Underrepresented in this collective research have been investigations into how social influence variables impact the legal claiming process. We add to the understanding of legal claiming by evaluating how perceived levels of accountability, reputation and political skill affect individuals' willingness to engage in contentious and non-contentious legal claiming. We also investigate the impact that social influence has on individuals' advice to other potential claimants. This study employed a longitudinal design utilizing both scenarios and survey data collection. Results from our study partially support the conclusion that individuals are more risk-averse in their own legal claiming considerations than they are in the advice they offer to similarly-situated others. Furthermore, accountability, reputation and interpersonal influence (one aspect of political skill) were found to significantly influence the likelihood of legal claiming. The pattern of results indicates

Coming home: Why veterans with disabilities withhold workplace accommodation requests

“…Rehabilitation Act (RA) section 503 and Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act (VEVRAA); Ceplenski, 2014). Organizations are willing to adapt policies to accommodate individuals as they believe there are benefits to doing so, but employers have struggled with employee disclosures (Hall et al, 2016; Rudstam et al, 2012). Therefore, understanding the nature of why individuals may choose not to seek the necessary assistance may be critical to implementing specific changes.…”

Toward a Public Administration Theory of Felt Accountability

“…This limited control is “balanced” by forms of social influence within (public) organizations. Civil servants use various tactics of social influence, such as reputation, organizational politics, or impressions management (Hall, Wikhamn, and Cardy 2016, 2255), to affect the behaviors of others. This suggests that it is not only difficult to pinpoint accountability but also that the account giver may affect the audience.…”

Unaccounted for no more: Explicating managers' role in accountability enactment

“…As suggested by role theory, accountability dynamics can be viewed as related to other concepts such as a social influence (Hall et al, 2016), impression management (Ammeter et al, 2004), fear of negative evaluation (Watson & Friend, 1969), and evaluation apprehension (Carver & Scheier, 1981). Because accountabilities evolve over time and are subject to interpersonal influences (Frink & Klimoski, 1998), managers and subordinates often both strive to proactively and reactively impact role signals, events, and design to reconstruct meaning so that it benefits them.…”

“…Managers primarily use accountabilities to constructively influence subordinates' behavior (Frink & Klimoski, 1998) to facilitate goal attainment. Subordinates, despite having less power in the dyad, can hold significant power in role episodes and actively exert influence over them by weighing and prioritizing accountabilities (Hall et al, 2016;Hall et al, 2017). For example, Ferris (1998, 1999) found that subordinates' goal setting efforts could be used as an active impression management tool.…”