2009
DOI: 10.1108/01437730911003885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social influence in military leadership training

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a renewed understanding of social influence in the military by exploring officers' decision‐making processes in a stressful situation. The intention is to develop self‐awareness as a central leadership capability in authentic leadership.Design/methodology/approachDuring wintertime in Norway, standing half‐naked and blindfolded on a wharf, officer cadets were offered the choice of jumping or not jumping into the icy ocean. From that starting point, a qualitative di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A qualitative clustering analysis of the open-ended responses yielded a hierarchical model of aspects which contribute to swift trust (or the lack thereof) with the following two superior categories: individual-related characteristics such as emotional stability and relationship-related characteristics such as encourage involvement and creativity. The latter superior category covaried most strongly with ratings of the groups' performance [29] Norway 21 cadets from the Norwegian Air Force Academy…”
Section: Quantitative/ Clustering Analysis and Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A qualitative clustering analysis of the open-ended responses yielded a hierarchical model of aspects which contribute to swift trust (or the lack thereof) with the following two superior categories: individual-related characteristics such as emotional stability and relationship-related characteristics such as encourage involvement and creativity. The latter superior category covaried most strongly with ratings of the groups' performance [29] Norway 21 cadets from the Norwegian Air Force Academy…”
Section: Quantitative/ Clustering Analysis and Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It was suggested that leaders in the Navy make independent decisions faster in environments where there is a lack of information within the mission command philosophy [19]. Additionally, military leaders were found to be influenced by their group or there was social influence in the military leader decision making process [29].…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is also sometimes referred to as personal risk [31]. However, it is possible that other aspects of RP may compete with one's own safety [32]. For example, family members or significant others in a residential evacuation may act as a modulating factor for one's own personal risk.…”
Section: Scope Of Rpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Student leaders should have had the regular opportunity to identify and examine their styles and preferences in training prior to assuming their duties. Future leaders must be able to consciously regulate their own cognitive process when making decisions in which circumstances are not ideal and when support from large staffs to make decisions is unavailable (Firing et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%