Social innovation and employment in the digital age: The case of the connect employment shuttles in Spain

Santocildes, Marta Enciso; Echaniz-Barrondo, Arantza; Gómez-Urquijo, Laura

doi:10.1016/j.ijis.2021.11.001

Cited by 16 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Digitalisation & Sustainability [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Digitalisation & SDG 4 (Quality Education) [8,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] Digitalisation & SDG 5 (Gender Equality) [54][55][56][57] Digitalisation & SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) [58][59][60][61][62][63] Digitalisation & SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) [1,64,65] Digitalisation & SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) [66][67][68][69][70][71] A good example of how to answer the question "How to Measure Digitalisation?" could be a Critical Evaluation of Digital Maturity Models prepared by Thordsen et al [72].…”

Section: Join Studies On Digitalisation Sustainability and Sdgs Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Enciso-Santocildes et al [63] investigated whether the novel method for combining employment with digitalisation is viable and trustworthy. The answer to this question is extremely important for corporate and governmental institutions interested in establishing effective anti-unemployment policies, particularly for vulnerable populations.…”

Section: Digitalisation's Link With Sdgmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Digitalisation as the Indicator of the Evidence of Sustainability in the European Union

Burinskienė

Seržantė

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digitalisation provides access to an integrated network of information that can benefit society and businesses. However, the evidence of sustainability in business is less researched. In our paper, by building up the research approach, we address the relevant gap by investigating how sustainable development goals represent the interrelationship between digitalisation and sustainability. Such research is particularly important because understandings of digitalisation and sustainability determine how different actors, including business managers and policymakers, act in response to those imperatives to develop future employees skills starting from school age. Following a multi-method approach, we have combined our analysis into two steps examining the relationship between digitalisation and sustainability. Building digital networks, business managers and policy makers using digital means can create some unique opportunities to strategically address sustainable development challenges for the United Nations Targets (SDG) to ensure higher productivity, education, and an equality-oriented society. This point of view describes the potential of digitalisation for society and businesses of the future. The authors revise the links between digitalisation and sustainability in the European Union countries by using data available in Eurostat and UNECE public databases. The two-stage methodology for the identification of the relationship between ICT and sustainability is used in the paper and a linear regression model is applied. The results showed tiers with five SDGs, focusing on business, and all these tiers are fixed in the constructed equations for each SDG. The recommended solution is statistically valid and proves the novelty of this research. Among digitalisation indicators, only mobile-cellular subscriptions and fixed-broadband sub-basket prices in part do not affect researched sustainable development indicators.

show abstract

Section: Join Studies On Digitalisation Sustainability and Sdgs Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Digitalisation's Link With Sdgmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digitalisation as the Indicator of the Evidence of Sustainability in the European Union

Burinskienė

Seržantė

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Digitalisation & Sustainability [30]- [41] Digitalisation & SDG4 [5], [42]- [51] Digitalisation & SDG5 [52]- [55] Digitalisation & SDG8 [56]- [62] Digitalisation & SDG9 [63]- [65] Digitalisation & SDG12 [66]- [71] Good example on how to answer the question "How to Measure Digitalisation?" could be a Critical Evaluation of Digital Maturity Models prepared by Thordsen et al [72].…”

Section: Topic Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Enciso-Santocildes et al [62] investigated if the novel method for combining employment with digitalisation is viable and trustworthy. The response is extremely important for corporate and governmental institutions interested in putting in place effective antiunemployment policies, particularly for vulnerable populations.…”

Section: Digitalisation Link With Sdg8mentioning

confidence: 99%

Digitalisation Affecting Sustainability Evidence from the European Union

Burinskienė¹,

Seržantė²

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digitalisation provides access to an integrated network of information that can benefit society, and business. Building digital network and society using digital means can create something unique opportunities to strategically address sustainable development challenges for the United Nations Targets (SDG) to ensure higher productivity, education and to equality oriented society. This point of view describes the potential of digitalisation for society and business of the future. The authors revise the links between digitalisation and sustainability in the European Union countries. The methodology for the research is suggested in the paper and linear regression method is applied. The results showed tiers with five SDG, focusing on society and business, and all these tiers are fixed in the constructed equations for each SDG. The suggested solution is statistically valid and proves the novelty of research. Among digitalisation indicators, only mobile-cellular subscriptions and fixed-broadband sub-basket prices in part have no effect on researched sustainable development indicators.

show abstract

“…However, research in these areas is rarely found. Currently available research focuses on entrepreneurship and leadership (Grilo & Moreira, 2022 ; Rana et al, 2022 ; Vaccaro & Ramus, 2022 ), transition, transformation, and impact within society (Avelino et al, 2019 ; Dall-Orsoletta et al, 2022 ; Kim et al, 2021 ; Ruthemeier et al, 2022 ), inter-organizational collaborations and value creation (Ozdemir & Gupta, 2021 ), business model, strategy, and governance (de Souza João-Roland & Granados, 2023 ; Dionisio & de Vargas, 2020 ; Gasparin et al, 2021 ; Ney, 2014 ; Peris-Ortiz et al, 2018 ), the role of technology (Boussafi et al, 2021 ; Conti & Orcioni, 2022 ; Enciso-Santocildes et al, 2021 ; C. Li & Bacete, 2022 ; Peterlin et al, 2021 ), and literature or conceptual framework regarding the concept (Ahmadi et al, 2022 ; Cajaiba-Santana, 2014 ; Daniel & Jenner, 2022 ; Fursov & Linton, 2022 ; Kim et al, 2021 ; Nicholls & Dees, 2015 ; Osburg & Schmidpeter, 2013 ; Rao-Nicholson et al, 2017 ; Solis-Navarrete et al, 2021 ; van der Have & Rubalcaba, 2016 ). In Indonesia, research on SI is still rarely found, and this term remains less popular than TI.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diffusion of Social Innovation: the Innovation Provider’s Perspective

Prihadyanti

Aziz²,

Sari³

2023

J Knowl Econ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social innovation (SI) is a potential solution to various problems and challenges in the agriculture sector. Agri-tech start-ups can be considered important agents for developing SI in the sector. In Indonesia, agri-tech start-ups are also expected to develop SI for sustainable agricultural development in the medium-term national development plan 2020–2024. Using multiple case studies, this paper attempts to complement the currently available literature and deepen the knowledge regarding the differences between SI and traditional innovation. This research also discusses the role of business organizations, represented by agri-tech start-ups, in developing SI, by observing the diffusion model and innovation-decision process. This research identifies characteristics of SI theoretically complemented with empirical description. Three models of diffusion leading to different types of innovation-decision processes and communication channels are identified. Several internal and external factors are influencing the diffusion process. In the process, the start-ups also hold bridging roles that vary according to company characteristics. Practical implications regarding successful SI development are provided.

show abstract

Social innovation and employment in the digital age: The case of the connect employment shuttles in Spain

Cited by 16 publications

References 9 publications

Digitalisation as the Indicator of the Evidence of Sustainability in the European Union

Digitalisation as the Indicator of the Evidence of Sustainability in the European Union

Digitalisation Affecting Sustainability Evidence from the European Union

Diffusion of Social Innovation: the Innovation Provider’s Perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About