2007
DOI: 10.4337/9781847206992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Innovations, Institutional Change and Economic Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These firms can actually be considered innovative start-ups because, as some authors point out [36][37][38], they are small technology-oriented companies that also share a vision and strategy to become global and/or international.…”
Section: New Technology-based Firms Technology Entrepreneurship and mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These firms can actually be considered innovative start-ups because, as some authors point out [36][37][38], they are small technology-oriented companies that also share a vision and strategy to become global and/or international.…”
Section: New Technology-based Firms Technology Entrepreneurship and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of social innovation is quite broad and refers to many economic aspects such as: institutional [38], social purposes [39], public goods [40] and also needs not yet taken into account by private markets [41].…”
Section: Social Innovation and Sustainability: A New Field Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance, (Hamalainen et al 2007) contains both an oblique definition and an explicit definition of social innovation. Both definitions emerge from the perspective of structuration theory and accept John Maynard Keynes' deep insight that ideas are more powerful vehicles of institutional change than vested interests.…”
Section: The Book Social Innovations Institutional Change and Economicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this definition is considered scientifically imprecise as it does not account for social innovations that were not intended as social at the point of invention, or social innovations that were not delivered through social means (Franz, Hochgerner, and Howaldt 2012). Thus, a conceptualisation of social innovation that highlights a change in or new interpretations of institutional elements such as roles, relations, expectations, practices, norms and values is more desirable (Franz, Hochgerner, and Howaldt 2012;Hämäläinen 2007). As this paper adopts a neo-institutional lens, it favours the following definition offered by Franz, Hochgerner, and Howaldt (2012, 6): 'social innovation consists of new, more effective and/or more efficient social practices with social ends and social means' .…”
Section: Social Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Academic interest in alternatives that use the market-based solutions to engage 'base of the pyramid' markets has increased in the recent past (Alvord, Brown, and Letts 2004;Dacin, Dacin, and Matear 2010;Mair and Martí 2006). Actors driven by this social mission may engage in social innovation which, according to Hämäläinen (2007), induces changes in a society's cultural, normative or regulative structures. Thus, such actors may be considered as institutional entrepreneurs as they mobilise resources to create divergent change to address social problems (Battilana, Leca, and Boxenbaum 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%