2020
DOI: 10.1177/0961000620904432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social justice in library science programs: A content analysis approach

Abstract: In an increasingly globalized world, social justice issues dominate the news. Libraries are often viewed as places where social justice ideals are upheld and promoted. This paper uses a content analysis methodology of 10 North American library and information science program websites to discover how social justice education is marketed to potential students through an examination of open access course descriptions, mission statements, and core learning objectives where available. Findings indicate that social … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How these are delivered to the students can vary, although there seems to be a move towards specific electives in LIS programmes which focus on social justice topics (Singh and Rioux, 2021). However, there are also arguments that embedding within the core curriculum would have more impact and existing offers are not sufficiently visible (Jones, 2020). There seems to be general agreement in Singh and Rioux’s statement that ‘conversations about social justice must start with addressing race, privilege, and intersectionality and their implications for the LIS workforce, as well as developing strategies to bridge gaps in prevailing power imbalances in the LIS profession’ (Singh and Rioux, 2021: 214).…”
Section: Nine Repertoiresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How these are delivered to the students can vary, although there seems to be a move towards specific electives in LIS programmes which focus on social justice topics (Singh and Rioux, 2021). However, there are also arguments that embedding within the core curriculum would have more impact and existing offers are not sufficiently visible (Jones, 2020). There seems to be general agreement in Singh and Rioux’s statement that ‘conversations about social justice must start with addressing race, privilege, and intersectionality and their implications for the LIS workforce, as well as developing strategies to bridge gaps in prevailing power imbalances in the LIS profession’ (Singh and Rioux, 2021: 214).…”
Section: Nine Repertoiresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the field became professionalized and universities took over LIS education, academic theory became the primary model for educating future librarians (Coleman, 1989). Recent studies have examined different efforts in LIS education in preparing future librarians for serving community members for social justice (Jones, 2020) and perceptions on library user education (Allard et al, 2020). The ongoing tension among theory and practice in LIS leaves disconnections to the communities they serve.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mehra will summarize key themes surrounding the notion of relevance from the panelists' presentations (e.g., intersectionality, Black feminism and communal‐collective perspective, geography or location‐driven context, and immigrant refugees' human information behaviors, etc.). He will integrate these and propose an impact‐driven concept of critical relevance that expects information professionals to better operationalize and implement social justice in ways that are fair, just, inclusive, and equitable (Jones, 2020; Mehra 2021a; Jaeger, Gorham, Taylor, and Kettnich, 2014). The push is for critical relevance to generate community‐based social justice impacts that are intentional (deliberate), systematic (rigorous), constructive (i.e., asset‐based), action‐oriented, and outcome‐driven (Cooke and Sweeney, 2017; Freire, 1970; Mehra Elmborg, and Sweeney, 2019).…”
Section: Panel Formatmentioning
confidence: 99%