2004
DOI: 10.1080/09687590410001689458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social justice: redistribution and recognition—a non‐reductionist perspective on disability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the 2011 WHO World Report on Disability gives evidence that disabled persons experience poorer level of health due to a variety of factors, such as inaccessible health care services, risk of developing secondary conditions, higher risk of being exposed to violence, increased rates of health risk behavior ( [90], pp. [57][58][59][60]. This is also recognized in the CRPD in the context of the rights to health.…”
Section: Proposition 5: Prevention Policy Can Be Human Rights Sensitivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the 2011 WHO World Report on Disability gives evidence that disabled persons experience poorer level of health due to a variety of factors, such as inaccessible health care services, risk of developing secondary conditions, higher risk of being exposed to violence, increased rates of health risk behavior ( [90], pp. [57][58][59][60]. This is also recognized in the CRPD in the context of the rights to health.…”
Section: Proposition 5: Prevention Policy Can Be Human Rights Sensitivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also allows us to analyze politics of disablement as the denial of social and cultural recognition, which is an aspect of the critique of the social model of disability [57,58]. The human rights model of disability demands that impairment is recognized in theories of justice.…”
Section: Proposition 3: Impairment Is To Be Recognized As Human Variamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stratified realist ontology is not, however, in conflict with Clarke's (2005) view that "everything in the situation both constitutes and affects most everything else in the situation in some way." Danermark and Gellerstedt (2004) argue that "in reality levels are entwined and [the] mechanisms could be supporting each other or counteracting each other, and the outcome in a specific context is the result of a very complex interplay between levels and mechanisms." Possible structures, mechanisms, contexts, and outcomes are shown below based on the findings from the Situational Analysis and Emergent Theory Generation presented here (Table 3).…”
Section: Lost Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one should bear in mind that table 4 is a conceptual framework demonstrating the interdisciplinary perspective of the target population in the current thesis. In reality, different levels are entwined and a lot of mechanisms could be supporting or counteracting each other, and the outcome in a specific context is the result of a very complex interplay between different levels and mechanisms (Danermark & Gellerstedt, 2004b …”
Section: Interdisciplinary Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current framework of this thesis is disability research, an area that covers biological, psychological, social and cultural aspects of functioning, impairment and disability (Danermark & Gellerstedt, 2004b). Traditionally, disability research has been conducted using theoretical models of medical and social approaches.…”
Section: Disability Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%