2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3403706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social License and Publicness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unethical and illegal behaviours undermine corporate legitimacy, credibility, and trust (Sale, 2019). This perception is commonly shared across countries, transcending economic, political, or legal climates established by different cultures (Payne et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unethical and illegal behaviours undermine corporate legitimacy, credibility, and trust (Sale, 2019). This perception is commonly shared across countries, transcending economic, political, or legal climates established by different cultures (Payne et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having a social license to operate means having legitimacy from internal stakeholders and outside stakeholders, and the greater community. Most importantly, it means identifying a business model as a proper social institution: beyond economic and market considerations, every business model is a social entity and thus subject to public accountability and public control (Sale 2019;Melé and Armengou 2015). Social license means also going beyond laws and regulations positioned within the legal system since it is related to credibility and social permission practices.…”
Section: The Need For a 'Social License To Operate' In The Digital Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…taking advantage 6 Boutilier and Thomson speak of 'stakeholder networks' to include many actors that are affected or affect business models beyond and above specific and local communities, such as international human rights activists and others (Boutilier and Thomson 2011, 2-3). of gaps in existing regulations, by the part of companies such as Facebook or Uber (Pollman 2019), while others have explored how the failure to account for the inherently public nature of corporate actions of private business models such as Uberregardless of whether an existing 'legal' license exists -can result in the loss of 'social' license (Sale 2019). Finally, others have highlighted the need to earn a social license for big data initiatives during the pandemic (Shaw and et al 2020) or have specifically introduced the issue of SLO in the governance and responsible management of the risk of digital corporations, but without providing straightforward suggestions on how to implement in concrete terms SLO in Big Techs' proactive strategic business models (Verbin 2020, Chap.…”
Section: The Need For a 'Social License To Operate' In The Digital Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…REs too need a moral cover to protect their social capital—a social license informally allowing a business to operate (e.g., 2021; Gunningham, Kagan and Thornton 2004)—to be able to negotiate deals. EA activity that the public finds unattractive, such as transactions designed to evade law enforcement, erodes stakeholder perceptions of the RE's trustworthiness and legitimacy (Sale 2019). In turn, erosion of a RE's social license can make negotiations with capital investors difficult or even increase attempts at government regulation or targeting by politicians outside the EA exchange (e.g., Zif 1980).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%