2012
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-0071-3.ch016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Media and Web 2.0 for Rethinking E-Government Maturity Models

Abstract: In this chapter, the authors argue that social media and Web 2.0 technologies have the potential to enhance government responsiveness, representation, citizen participation, and overall satisfaction with the public policy-making process. To do that, this chapter suggests the dialectical approach of a new E-government maturity model through both New Public Service and Social Construction of Public Administration views. Then, they provide guidance to practitioners who are responsible for developing social media … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E-participation encompasses government’s interaction with public such as informing public of government activities, government’s consultation with public on policy making, and empowering them for decision making (UN, 2014). The initial models of e-government maturity were associated with the new public management aimed at reinventing government to work better and cost less, and treated citizens as customers (Kettl, 2015; Kim & Robinson, 2014). However, Denhardt and Denhardt (2000) proposed principles of new public service as an improvement upon the new public management, focusing on democratic governance where there are opportunities for citizens to define policy problems, and develop and implement solutions (Denhardt & Denhardt, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…E-participation encompasses government’s interaction with public such as informing public of government activities, government’s consultation with public on policy making, and empowering them for decision making (UN, 2014). The initial models of e-government maturity were associated with the new public management aimed at reinventing government to work better and cost less, and treated citizens as customers (Kettl, 2015; Kim & Robinson, 2014). However, Denhardt and Denhardt (2000) proposed principles of new public service as an improvement upon the new public management, focusing on democratic governance where there are opportunities for citizens to define policy problems, and develop and implement solutions (Denhardt & Denhardt, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Denhardt and Denhardt (2000) proposed principles of new public service as an improvement upon the new public management, focusing on democratic governance where there are opportunities for citizens to define policy problems, and develop and implement solutions (Denhardt & Denhardt, 2000). This encouraged an e-government approach that includes citizens as an essential part of policy design and implementation (e.g., Kim & Robinson, 2014; Nabatchi & Mergel, 2010). The later models of e-government based on new public service approach include public participation, often as an advanced stage of e-government (Kim & Robinson, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations