2023
DOI: 10.55529/jmcc.31.7.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Media as a Supplemental Tool in Blended Learning

Abstract: During the pandemic, various tools were used to supplement education in the blended learning platform. This study was initiated to explore the experience of students in their use of social media in blended learning. The study employed a qualitative design which involved 14 participants. An inclusion criterion was designed by the researchers to select the most suitable participants for the study. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the responses of the participants. Results show that social media platforms ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This complies with the recommended number to achieve saturation of data [14]. A similar practice was observed in other qualitative studies [15][16][17]. The 14 participants were split into two groups: 7 for In-depth Interview (IDI) and 7 for the Focus group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This complies with the recommended number to achieve saturation of data [14]. A similar practice was observed in other qualitative studies [15][16][17]. The 14 participants were split into two groups: 7 for In-depth Interview (IDI) and 7 for the Focus group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The number of participants was intended as it complies with recommended number as well as reaching data saturation [12]. This was also adhered by other qualitative studies [13][14]. The research instrument used was a semi structured interview guide.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason was that with a smaller group, it is easier for the researcher to build strong close relationships with the participants, which in turn leads to more natural conversations and better data. Similarly, having a smaller group of participants was also the practice of other qualitative studies [9][10][11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%