2019
DOI: 10.1080/10714421.2019.1651153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social media, legacy media and gatekeeping: the protest paradigm in news of Ferguson and Charlottesville

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, it is noteworthy that they tend to prefer social media to fact check information they find suspicious, while other voters prefer legacy media channels. Future research on the Brazilian case should aim to unravel the complex paths different groups adopt for accessing and verifying information, possibly combining social and legacy media, as explored by Ismail et al (2019) and Ejaz (2021) in other contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, it is noteworthy that they tend to prefer social media to fact check information they find suspicious, while other voters prefer legacy media channels. Future research on the Brazilian case should aim to unravel the complex paths different groups adopt for accessing and verifying information, possibly combining social and legacy media, as explored by Ismail et al (2019) and Ejaz (2021) in other contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this scenario has become more complex with the rapid growth of social networks as a source of political information. Studies that focus on the supply of information, such as Amani Ismail's case study on the interplay between social networks and local traditional media during the extremeright protests in Ferguson (2014) and Charlottesville (2017), demonstrate that journalistic coverage can be significantly influenced by agendas and themes originating from social networks (Ismail et al 2019). On the demand side, there is evidence that, nowadays, social networks and traditional media jointly influence the formation of political preferences and identities (Ejaz 2021).…”
Section: The Far Right and Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional media regulate the production and distribution of news content they deem worthy (Suran & Kilgo, 2017) as part of their gatekeeping function (Ali & Fahmy, 2013;Xu & Feng, 2014). Since the advent of social media, the gatekeeping role of traditional media has been diluted by citizen-driven information sharing through social media (Gerbaudo, 2012), initially leading scholars to hope for more democratic forms of societal dialogue (Biekart & Fowler, 2013; see also analysis in Ismail et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Use Of Social Media By Traditional Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M. McLeod, 2007, p. 185). This usually means that protesters are framed by the media as “deviants” (Ismail et al, 2019, p.174; Mourão et al, 2021, p. 324), with reporters focused more on acts of lawlessness by protesters, with rare chances for protests to have their claims or grievances published (Kilgo & Harlow, 2019; Mourão et al, 2021). This approach to protest coverage was noticed by some scholars in the case of the Floyd protests, with news outlets focused on police in riot gear and images of protesters destroying property (Kilgo, 2020).…”
Section: Agenda Setting Theory the News Media And Hip-hop Musicmentioning
confidence: 99%