Social Media Listening and Digital Profiling Study of People With Headache and Migraine: Retrospective Infodemiology Study

Abstract

Background There is an unmet need for a better understanding and management of headache, particularly migraine, beyond specialist centers, which may be facilitated using digital technology. Objective The objective of this study was to identify where, when, and how people with headache and migraine describe their symptoms and the nonpharmaceutical and medicinal treatments used as indicated on social media. Methods Social media sources, including Twitter, web-based forums, blogs, YouTube, and review sites, were searched using a predefined search string related to headache and migraine. The real-time data from social media posts were collected retrospectively for a 1-year period from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018 (Japan), or a 2-year period from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018 (Germany and France). The data were analyzed after collection, using content analysis and audience profiling. Results A total of 3,509,828 social media posts related to headache and migraine were obtained from Japan in 1 year and 146,257 and 306,787 posts from Germany and France, respectively, in 2 years. Among social media sites, Twitter was the most used platform across these countries. Japanese sufferers used specific terminology, such as “tension headaches” or “cluster headaches” (36%), whereas French sufferers even mentioned specific migraine types, such as ocular (7%) and aura (2%). The most detailed posts on headache or migraine were from Germany. The French sufferers explicitly mentioned “headache or migraine attacks” in the “evening (41%) or morning (38%),” whereas Japanese mentioned “morning (48%) or night (27%)” and German sufferers mentioned “evening (22%) or night (41%).” The use of “generic terms” such as medicine, tablet, and pill were prevalent. The most discussed drugs were ibuprofen and naproxen combination (43%) in Japan; ibuprofen (29%) in Germany; and acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol, and caffeine combination (75%) in France. The top 3 nonpharmaceutical treatments are hydration, caffeinated beverages, and relaxation methods. Of the sufferers, 44% were between 18 and 24 years of age. Conclusions In this digital era, social media listening studies present an opportunity to provide unguided, self-reported, sufferers’ perceptions in the real world. The generation of social media evidence requires appropriate methodology to translate data into scientific information and relevant medical insights. This social media listening study showed country-specific differences in headache and migraine symptoms experienced and in the times of the day and treatments used. Furthermore, this study highlighted the prevalence of social media usage by younger sufferers compared to that by older sufferers.

Understanding Public Perceptions and Discussions on Fibromyalgia through Social Media: Cross-Sectional Infodemiology Study

“…In this study, we found that users of X had greater interactions when the content of the tweets was related to headache, likely because headache is the most common neurological disorder in the population 28 . Many studies have demonstrated the use of social media platforms to share experiences with headaches 35,36 . Additionally, there are multiple reports linking headaches with social media use 29 , as somatic symptoms, including headaches, have been found primarily in patients with problematic use of social media 29,37 .…”

Infodemiology as a Powerful Tool in Public Health: Bridging the Digital Divide for Better Well-being

“…Queries from search engines are primarily retrieved by Google Trends [18] , as well as Yandex [19] , Baidu [20] , Bing [21] , and Yahoo [22] . Other notable sources include websites and platforms [23,24] : blogs, YouTube, forums, and online communities. According to Statista, as of July 2023, Google dominated the global search engine market, with a share of approximately 83.49%, compared to Bing (9.19%), Yahoo (2.72%), YANDEX (1.9%), Baidu (0.51%), and DuckDuckGo (0.77%) [25] .…”

Migraine Information on the Web for Patients: A YouTube Content Analysis Based on a Scoring System

“…Only a minor portion of the videos regarding migraine treatment are authorized by healthcare professionals, whereas the majority of the videos are from non-healthcare advisors, which might affect the quality of the treatment received by patients following online platforms [ 8 ]. This might discourage patients from making a hospital visit upon an attack or seeking treatment afterward [ 9 ].…”