Social media, migration and the platformization of moral panic: Evidence from Canada

Abstract

As a contentious issue affecting the character, boundaries and future of social order, migration represents a recurrent source of moral panic. While analysts have considered conventional outlets’ role in triggering collective alarm, less is known about social media’s effects on migration’s construction as a social problem. Working with an original dataset of tweets from the 2019 Canadian election, a period of heightened concern and outcry for significant portions of the electorate, this paper employs content analytic methods to assess migration’s online demonization and interrogate the patterns of framing, participation and engagement brought within the issue’s orbit. Alongside documenting significant disquiet and antipathy, its findings suggest that Twitter is transforming panic production and facilitating forms of reaction involving mass-participation and collaboration; interference from automated ‘bots’ and considerable dispute, dissent and negotiation. Based on these results, the sensitizing concept of platformed panics is proposed to capture how social media’s technical affordances, design and appropriation align to promote moral panics that are networked, algorithmic and contested.

Victims or Attackers? Deconstructing the Mediatic Image of Migrants at the Romanian-Serbian-Hungarian Border with the Use of Multidimensional Instruments

“…Our analysis revealed that the media tries to impose its own vision regarding migrants, either by neglecting them and their needs, or emphasising on negative aspects (the imagological projection of the attacker) by insisting on elements that may cause panic among the general population. The aspect is not new and has been noticed by other researchers in other areas of the world (Walsh & Hill, 2022). Less often, they focus on the struggles that migrants are facing.…”

Ubuntu Precepts and the Coverage of Xenophobic Discourses in South African Community Newspapers: An Afrocentric Systematic Critique

“…Walsh and Hill advocate for the promotion of counter-narratives that humanise immigrants and challenge stereotypes. 39 Additionally, this paper argues that media literacy programmes can empower individuals to critically analyse media content, discerning between factual reporting and biased narratives. This highlights the pervasive issue of xenophobic languages and immigrants' stereotypical depiction in print media.…”