Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Purpose This paper aims to investigate the utilisation of street food to redefine place management in public spaces in Egypt. The study examines the spatiotemporal effects of this approach, considering the preferences of both vendors and consumers alongside contextual design factors. Design/methodology/approach In this study, conducted in Cairo, Egypt, a spatial ethnographic approach was used to delve into the process of place management in areas hosting street food activities. Focus group interviews were conducted with a random sample of street food vendors and consumers. Findings The results of this case study confirm the significant impact of street food on its surroundings, emphasising the importance of the people–place relationship. Insights from group interviews shed light on essential questions regarding the timing, location and drivers of spatiotemporal effects around food activity areas, as well as the entities controlling these effects and their mechanisms. The findings underscore the necessity of harmoniously balancing the needs of vendors and consumers without detrimentally affecting the context. Practical implications The proactive insights gleaned from this study hold potential for replication in other cities, offering valuable insights into the roles and specialisations of actors involved in managing street food places. However, achieving a more comprehensive understanding of stereotypes and underlying themes is imperative. Originality/value This study contributes to filling a research gap by exploring strategies to integrate vendors’ and consumers’ preferences and designs into specific contexts. It provides proactive and preventive solutions to mitigate adverse spatiotemporal effects of street food activities within the studied context.
Purpose This paper aims to investigate the utilisation of street food to redefine place management in public spaces in Egypt. The study examines the spatiotemporal effects of this approach, considering the preferences of both vendors and consumers alongside contextual design factors. Design/methodology/approach In this study, conducted in Cairo, Egypt, a spatial ethnographic approach was used to delve into the process of place management in areas hosting street food activities. Focus group interviews were conducted with a random sample of street food vendors and consumers. Findings The results of this case study confirm the significant impact of street food on its surroundings, emphasising the importance of the people–place relationship. Insights from group interviews shed light on essential questions regarding the timing, location and drivers of spatiotemporal effects around food activity areas, as well as the entities controlling these effects and their mechanisms. The findings underscore the necessity of harmoniously balancing the needs of vendors and consumers without detrimentally affecting the context. Practical implications The proactive insights gleaned from this study hold potential for replication in other cities, offering valuable insights into the roles and specialisations of actors involved in managing street food places. However, achieving a more comprehensive understanding of stereotypes and underlying themes is imperative. Originality/value This study contributes to filling a research gap by exploring strategies to integrate vendors’ and consumers’ preferences and designs into specific contexts. It provides proactive and preventive solutions to mitigate adverse spatiotemporal effects of street food activities within the studied context.
PurposeThe objective of this article is to analyze the mediating role of innovation capability—both radical and incremental—between technological turbulence and digital innovation ecosystem performance, considering the impact of cross-organizational knowledge sabotage. Despite the enthusiasm surrounding digitization, the high failure rate (80%) of digital transformation projects has received limited attention. This alarming statistic indicates a potential rise in opportunistic behaviors within organizations. We hypothesize that employees seeking to reduce the risk of being displaced by digital technologies, may not only hide knowledge, as previously observed, but also engage in knowledge sabotage by disseminating inaccurate information during the co-creation of digital innovations within the digital innovation ecosystem.Design/methodology/approachThe study employed structural equation modeling to examine moderated mediation using survey data collected from 148 firms, mainly from sectors of high to medium levels of digital intensity.FindingsThe most significant finding indicates that cross-organizational knowledge sabotage considerably reduces the only mediating effect, namely that of incremental innovation capability.Originality/valueOur study presents a novel perspective by investigating the phenomenon of cross-organizational knowledge sabotage. Unlike prior research, which primarily identified the existence of knowledge hiding, our findings suggest that employees are not only willing to withhold information but also to disseminate inaccurate information to external partners. Consequently, our research extends the boundaries of the existing knowledge field by demonstrating that cross-organizational knowledge sabotage has repercussions that extend beyond intra-organizational impacts, as previously recognized. It also adversely affects the outcomes of collaborative work within the digital innovation ecosystem.
Background In the VUCA era, employee innovation behavior is critical to a enterprise success. In China's high power distance and collectivist culture, employee innovation behavior is often influenced by leadership authority, leading to a division between proactive and reactive innovation behavior, with each having a different effect on innovation performance. Innovation is influenced not only by leadership type but also by leadership mindset. As a unidimensional approach focused on bottom-line profits while neglecting other important factors, leader bottom-line mentality (LBLM) and its effect on employee innovation behavior, especially on proactive and reactive innovation, has yet to be thoroughly explored. Understanding this dual influence can help balance short-term profit goals with long-term innovation development. Methods This study employed a two-stage survey method, conducting a questionnaire survey with employees from 13 innovation-driven enterprises, ultimately collecting 351 valid responses. Using SPSS and MPLUS software, the data were analyzed through reliability and validity tests, confirmatory factor analysis, descriptive statistics, and linear regression to validate the proposed research hypotheses. Results the study finds that LBLM has a significantly negative effect on employee proactive innovation behavior but a positive effect on reactive innovation behavior. Moreover, employees' willingness to take risks mediates the relationship between LBLM and employee innovation behavior. At the same time, intrinsic work values negatively moderate the relationship between LBLM and Willingness to take risks, enhancing proactive innovation behavior and reducing reactive innovation behavior. On the other hand, extrinsic work values positively moderate the relationship, enhancing reactive innovation behavior and reducing proactive innovation behavior. Conclusion As a unidimensional mentality, LBLM has a double-edged effect on employee innovation behavior: it positively predicts reactive innovation behavior while negatively predicting proactive innovation behavior. However, this effect is moderated by work values; intrinsic work values weaken the double-edged effect, whereas extrinsic work values enhance its influence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.