2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social media platforms, open communication and problem solving in the back-office of Ghanaian extension: A substantive, structural and relational analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Where it may be too soon for apps, it may be legitimate to explore alternative digital tools [89]. For example, the Myanmar cases corresponded with findings from a survey with Burmese farmers [34] and illustrated the need for multiple digital and non-digital channels to reach and engage with more farmers, which additionally widens the access to information for more user groups [90][91][92]. To build Southeast Asian farmers' trust in agricultural advisory apps, co-design requires that developers, programmers and software communities gain a better understanding of farmers' interactions on other social media platforms and how they adapt messaging apps and self-managed chatrooms for sharing forecasts, agroadvisories and knowledge [34,38,93], teaching themselves to build up e-literacy.…”
Section: The Passengers-smallholder Farmersmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Where it may be too soon for apps, it may be legitimate to explore alternative digital tools [89]. For example, the Myanmar cases corresponded with findings from a survey with Burmese farmers [34] and illustrated the need for multiple digital and non-digital channels to reach and engage with more farmers, which additionally widens the access to information for more user groups [90][91][92]. To build Southeast Asian farmers' trust in agricultural advisory apps, co-design requires that developers, programmers and software communities gain a better understanding of farmers' interactions on other social media platforms and how they adapt messaging apps and self-managed chatrooms for sharing forecasts, agroadvisories and knowledge [34,38,93], teaching themselves to build up e-literacy.…”
Section: The Passengers-smallholder Farmersmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…On their own initiative plant doctors began to use these chat groups to communicate on a wide range of topics, sharing observations on pest incidence, seeking advice on treating less-common plant pests, discussing logistics, and also socialising with colleagues. A Plantwise survey in Ghana found that plant doctors adapted the use of the chat groups because they were user-friendly, enabled interaction with otherwise busy colleagues, and facilitated immediate two-way communication in large groups (Munthali et al, 2021). Although varying from country to country, Plantwise adopted the practice of adding new trainees to both dedicated small groups of local trainees and larger national chat groups.…”
Section: Plantwise: Ict-enhanced Advisory Services In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we use scientific literature, the research of Munthali et al (2021) on chat groups in Ghana's agricultural advisory system, and other insights from Plantwise to ref lect on documented Plantwise chat group experiences. These insights are used to consider possible future dynamics and functioning of the Plantwise backstopping chat groups across pluralistic agricultural advisory systems in Africa.…”
Section: The Functioning Of Chat Groups In the Agricultural Advisory Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as several authors indicate (Chowdhury and Hambly Odame 2013;Stevens et al 2016;Klerkx 2020;Ofori and El-Gayar 2020;Steinke et al 2020), there is still relatively little empirical research on social media in the agri-food domain, particularly on its instrumental use by research, extension and education organisations, and the information networks that are formed as a result. Earlier work has generally studied the information and knowledge diffusion process by focusing on face-to-face interactions in nonvirtual settings (Materia, Giarè, and Klerkx 2015), and there are still limited insights on how this works in social media settings despite that recently more attention is being given to this (Kaushik et al 2018;Mills et al 2019;Klerkx, Jakku and Labarthe 2019;Ofori and El-Gayar 2020;Munthali et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%