2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-019-08291-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social media prediction: a literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Digital technologies are used in digital health initiatives including various types of technology, including those designed for information sharing, communication, clinical decision support, ‘digital therapies’, patient and/or population monitoring and control, bioinformatics and personalized medicine, and service user health informatics (Coiera, 2015 ). A survey showed that the vast number of experts, more than 75 %, use Twitter data, and more than half prefer to use regression algorithms to do social media prediction, but not all forecasting models can predict accurately, and prediction appears to be reliable on the affiliated field (Rousidis et al, 2020 ). Although the social media population comprises only a specific fraction of the population, the reach of its posts can cover broader impacts through social multiplier effects (McClellan et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Digital technologies are used in digital health initiatives including various types of technology, including those designed for information sharing, communication, clinical decision support, ‘digital therapies’, patient and/or population monitoring and control, bioinformatics and personalized medicine, and service user health informatics (Coiera, 2015 ). A survey showed that the vast number of experts, more than 75 %, use Twitter data, and more than half prefer to use regression algorithms to do social media prediction, but not all forecasting models can predict accurately, and prediction appears to be reliable on the affiliated field (Rousidis et al, 2020 ). Although the social media population comprises only a specific fraction of the population, the reach of its posts can cover broader impacts through social multiplier effects (McClellan et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several existing pieces of literature have researched health-related studies associated with AI use on social media through the following ways: simple frequency analysis, content analysis, semantic analysis, supervised learning, and a major analytic approach (i.e., time series analysis and forecasting techniques) (Briand et al, 2018;McClellan et al, 2017;D'Alfonso, 2020;Rousidis et al, 2020). The time series analysis has some limitations such as the lack of ability to recognize sarcastic or humorous tweets, but it could be refined if combines with sentiment analysis (McClellan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El utilizar los argumentos basados en el comportamiento de los likes/reacciones de los usuarios, representa la fuerza del vínculo social en un contexto de comportamiento de rebaño y proporciona una visión sobre el comportamiento de los usuarios de las redes sociales y la influencia social (Meng et al, 2020). Así mismo, la Minería de opiniones se ocupa de analizar las opiniones, criticas, actitudes y emociones de las personas hacia diferentes marcas, empresas, productos e incluso individuos usando algoritmos de preprocesamiento de texto (Rousidis et al, 2020).…”
Section: Enfoques Y Modelos De Análisis Para Social Mediaunclassified
“…However, as it happens in related fields [38], the preferences of the users over time could be biased by several factors, not reflecting their real preferences [39]. A systematic overview has been provided in [40], where the authors reviewed the recent literature, offering statistics and discussing about methods, algorithms, techniques, and challenges.…”
Section: Popularity In Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%