Social Media Responses to Elective Surgery Cancellations in the Wake of COVID-19

Abstract

Objective: To assess public response to cancellations of elective surgeries following the American College of Surgeons' (ACS) recommendation on March 13. Methods: We queried text comments from Reddit, a social media platform and the fifth most popular website in the United States. Comments were manually reviewed to assess for relevance to elective surgery in the United States during the global coronavirus outbreak, whether the text was written by a healthcare worker (HCW), whether the user was based in the United States, and whether the text documented cancellations of surgery, expected cancellations of surgery, or surgery ongoing after the ACS announcement. Analysis of overall sentiment and negativity in comment text was performed using the Valence Aware Dictionary for sEntiment Reasoning (VADER), a validated natural language processing tool previously used in studies of health behaviors using social media. Non-parametric tests were used for subgroup comparisons based on posting date and characteristics identified during manual review. Results: Following manual review, 1272 comments were included for analysis. Overall sentiment among non-HCWs became significantly more negative following the ACS announcement (P ¼ 0.037). Overall sentiment did not significantly differ between HCWs and non-HCWs prior to the ACS announcement (P ¼ 0.98), but non-HCW sentiment became significantly more negative than HCW sentiment after the announcement (P ¼ 0.027). Negativity scores in posts describing cancellations were significantly higher among posts written by non-HCWs than HCWs (P ¼ 0.028). Conclusions: Cancellation of elective surgeries had an adverse emotional impact on non-HCWs. This finding highlights the importance of access to elective surgery to patients' emotional well-being.

Evaluating Pediatric ACL Injury-Related Content Across Various Social Media Platforms

“…12 The simple form of quantitative analysis used in our study does not provide sophisticated results compared to other social media study methods such as sentiment analysis. [13][14][15][16] Using sentiment analysis could have provided a deeper insight into the content of the social media posts that were examined. Another limitation concerns the way credentials such as Dr., M.D., and D.O.…”

General practitioners' wellbeing during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Novel methods with social media data

“…While Twitter data have been used to identify experiences and opinions on COVID‐19 from the public (Ainley et al, 2021; Alomari et al, 2021; Babvey et al, 2021; Dyer & Kolic, 2020; Gao et al, 2021; Guntuku et al, 2020; Huang et al, 2020; Karami & Anderson, 2020; Koh & Liew, 2022; Lee et al, 2020; Lwin et al, 2020; Osakwe et al, 2021; Rao et al, 2020; Skalski et al, 2017; Su et al, 2020; Valdez et al, 2020) and USA medical professionals (Sullivan et al, 2021; Wahbeh et al, 2020), it has not been used to study the impact of the pandemic on the wellbeing of NHS GPs practising in the United Kingdom (Jefferson, Golder, et al, 2022). In a systematic review published in 2022, we identified 31 studies exploring the impact of COVID‐19 on primary care doctors' mental health and wellbeing; all of which relied upon traditional methods of data collection; namely surveys or interviews (Jefferson, Golder, et al, 2022).…”

General Practitioner perspectives and wellbeing during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a mixed method social media analysis

“…Unsurprisingly, this has focused recently on issues related to COVID-19 and work practices [16]. Analysis of Twitter posts is used commonly to identify public experiences and opinions, including recently on COVID-19 and its impact [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].Medical professionals' opinions about COVID-19 have been studied using social media [32], but no studies to date have examined GP wellbeing using social media monitoring, which is the aim of this study.…”