2017
DOI: 10.15694/mep.2017.000083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Media use within medical education: A systematic review to develop a pilot questionnaire on how social media can be best used at BSMS

Abstract: Background: Since the early 2000s social media has become a major part of our daily lives, and over the past decade it has found its way into the medical profession. Despite its ubiquity, only 5 systematic reviews exist on the subject of social medial use within medical education. The reviews conclude that there are positive correlations linked to social media use however the studies are restricted by the same limitations: a lack of quantitative data and the fact that social media research fast becomes outdate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessing evidence from other professional disciplines could benefit our understanding of social media in nursing and midwifery education, especially as interprofessional education in healthcare is coming to the fore (Mckay, Steiner, Shekhter, & Birnbach, ; O'Connor, ). Common themes across the reviews from medical and general health education that are in keeping with the findings of this review include evaluating learning outcomes, understanding e‐Professionalism, maximizing flexible learning and online communities for social support, managing workload associated with virtual interactions, and technical difficulties with some social media platforms (Cheston et al., ; Smith & Lambert, ; Sterling et al., ; Whyte & Hennessy, ). These would benefit from further interdisciplinary research to ensure we can learn lessons and implement pedagogical solutions that work for all types of healthcare students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assessing evidence from other professional disciplines could benefit our understanding of social media in nursing and midwifery education, especially as interprofessional education in healthcare is coming to the fore (Mckay, Steiner, Shekhter, & Birnbach, ; O'Connor, ). Common themes across the reviews from medical and general health education that are in keeping with the findings of this review include evaluating learning outcomes, understanding e‐Professionalism, maximizing flexible learning and online communities for social support, managing workload associated with virtual interactions, and technical difficulties with some social media platforms (Cheston et al., ; Smith & Lambert, ; Sterling et al., ; Whyte & Hennessy, ). These would benefit from further interdisciplinary research to ensure we can learn lessons and implement pedagogical solutions that work for all types of healthcare students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, the poor quality of many studies in the review and lack of experimental research meant it was difficult to draw decisive conclusions about the effect of social media on learning. Systematic reviews of social media in other educational fields such as medicine (Cheston, Flickinger, & Chisolm, 2013;Sterling, Leung, Wright, & Bishop, 2017;Whyte & Hennessy, 2017) and general health education (Smith & Lambert, 2014) have also reported moderate to poor quality studies. They concluded there was limited evidence of the effectiveness of learning via social media.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The submissions we received have primarily surrounded innovative learning and teaching approaches including the use of technology with respect to social media (Whyte & Hennessy, 2017), 3D printing (Li et al, 2017), peer teaching (Border et al, 2017;Simpson, Curley, Veloso Costa, & Ahmed, 2017), artistic learning methods (James, O'Connor, & Nagraj, 2017;Keenan, Hutchinson, & Bell, 2017), the flipped classroom (Stoner, Caruana, & Stabile, 2017), the impact of psychometric abilities (Smith et al, 2017) and a description of an integrated Life Sciences course (Fenoll-Brunet et al, 2017). The theme also includes a call for focus on a particularly concerning worldwide Life Sciences topic (Pyatt & Bowater, 2017).…”
Section: Life Sciences In An Integrated Curriculummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the majority of the themed articles concerned anatomy education (Border et al, 2017;James et al, 2017;Keenan et al, 2017;Li et al, 2017;Smith et al, 2017;Stoner et al, 2017;Whyte & Hennessy, 2017), this would perhaps be expected given the apparent proportion of active researchers and published literature in this field when compared to other Life Sciences disciplines. However, we have also received submissions from the relatively less well represented areas of the Life Sciences including physiology (Simpson et al, 2017), microbiology and public health (Pyatt & Bowater, 2017), and the Life Sciences more generally (Fenoll-Brunet et al, 2017;.…”
Section: Life Sciences In An Integrated Curriculummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation