2021
DOI: 10.1177/00380261211009061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social movements as agents of change: Fighting intersectional food inequalities, building food as webs of life

Abstract: What does the diversity of social movements and food initiatives tell us about processes of social change? I argue that they offer a productive analytical lens to observe social change because they identify injustices and dynamics of inequalities in the food system and are actively engaged in transforming these. Alternative local food initiatives react to the environmental impacts of globalized food relations; food sovereignty movements highlight class inequalities and power asymmetries in the food system that… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…and (e) asymmetries in power relations which shape the production of knowledge, problem definitions, and the search for solutions (for an overview, see [27][28][29]). Studies of food justice, food sovereignty, and food regimes analyze and conceptualize food-related inequalities, while many of these focus on gender-related and intersectional inequalities and the efforts of social movements to challenge existing power relations [30][31][32]. Food regime theory, as developed chiefly by [33,34], pays special attention to power effects and class inequalities arising from the "corporate-environmental food regime" [34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and (e) asymmetries in power relations which shape the production of knowledge, problem definitions, and the search for solutions (for an overview, see [27][28][29]). Studies of food justice, food sovereignty, and food regimes analyze and conceptualize food-related inequalities, while many of these focus on gender-related and intersectional inequalities and the efforts of social movements to challenge existing power relations [30][31][32]. Food regime theory, as developed chiefly by [33,34], pays special attention to power effects and class inequalities arising from the "corporate-environmental food regime" [34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholarship on AFOs highlights their collective action by bringing about alternative forms of food production, distribution and consumption (e.g. Forno & Graziano, 2014;Goodman et al, 2012;Huber & Lorenzini, 2022;Motta, 2021;Pascucci et al, 2021). As progressive social movement organisations in the food sector, AFOs are united both in their critique of the contemporary industrialised food system and in their striving for a fundamental, transformative change towards a radically alternative food system.…”
Section: Sustainability Politics Through Alternative Food Organisationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, CSO documents tend to mobilize political action by society and demand government responses to public problems. CSO are considered to be the driving forces of transformation in food system structures while confronting control and power by large corporations (CSM, 2020;Canfield et al, 2021;Motta, 2021).…”
Section: Transitions To Sustainable Food Systems and Disputes In Narr...mentioning
confidence: 99%