Social movements in crisis? From the 15-M movement to the electoral shift in Spain

Abstract

Purpose Social left-wing political contestation and activism in Spain have undergone great changes over the past four years. First, there has been a shift from the 15-M movement that took over public plazas with its ambiguous claims basically related to radical democracy and rejection of institutional politics, to a new focus on social problems generated by the crisis, highlighting issues such as housing and cutbacks in social rights. Second, there has been a shift towards institutional politics in 2014. How should this recent whirlwind evolution in political contestation to status quo be understood? What is the relation between the changing material conditions of the population and the extremely shifting shape of left-wing militancy in Spain? The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach The arguments put forward here are based on the authors’ involvement in social movements in the city of Seville between 2011 and the current time. They have been complemented with in-depth interviews of social activists who have taken part in the movements: 15-M assemblies, the housing movement, general strikes and, in more recent times, electoral initiatives (Podemos and Ganemos). The interviews were done between 2012 and 2014. The fieldwork has been complemented with an exploration of documentary sources: the manifests and writings of the various organisations that are being addressed. Findings In the transition from 15-M assemblies to the recent shift in electoral initiatives, social protest have turned from direct democracy demands and the rejection of institutionalised politics to a progressively pragmatic and short-term position where institutions are targeted. This paper argues that the generalised impoverishment of the population, increased numbers of evictions and consistently high unemployment rates have broadened the social framework for the action of social movements. The political and ideological crisis, rooted in the majority of the population’s crumbling expectations of social progress has enabled the array of possibilities to be opened up to emancipatory politics. Originality/value It is argued that massive deprivation provoked by the economic crisis has been a fundamental factor in the movements’ new orientation, what as a consequence, and until certain extent, throws the New Social Movements discourses into crisis itself, at least with regard to its post-materialistic nature and its opposition to institutions of the State.

Social Movements and Social Policy: New Research Horizons

“…The emergence of the global 2010+ movements (e.g., the Arab Spring, the Indignados, and Occupy), led to a renewed interest in and research on the relationship between SMs and social policy (Díaz-Parra and Jover-Báez, 2016, Seckinelgin, 2016, Edmiston and Humpage, 2018. Scholars examined SMs challenging the privatization and commodification of welfare services (Mladenov, 2015, Roulstone andMorgan, 2009), austerity cuts (Harrison and Risager, 2016) and rising inequalities and precarity within and across countries (Runciman, 2016).…”

Leaving Spain

“…Although he deeply identified as an activist, he started to doubt the purpose of the assemblies, as the content of their discussions was very abstract. By adding the comment "we didn't support any party", Tomas contextualised this initial lack of orientation as he was referring to a time before the formation of Podemos in 2014 (Diaz-Parra & Jover-Baez, 2016;Booth & Baert 2018).…”

Political conversations on Twitter in a disruptive scenario: The role of “party evangelists” during the 2015 Spanish general elections

“…After the 15M movement in 2011 and in line with the social protests of the so-called Indignados (Anduiza, Cristancho, & Sabucedo, 2014;Díaz-Parra & Jover-Báez, 2016), it became a political force with the aim of winning the 2014 European Elections. It tried to channel the general discontent in Spain resulting from the economic crisis and based mainly on the fight against corruption and refinancing the national debt.…”