Social Network Analysis for Program Implementation

Abstract

This paper introduces the use of social network analysis theory and tools for implementation research. The social network perspective is useful for understanding, monitoring, influencing, or evaluating the implementation process when programs, policies, practices, or principles are designed and scaled up or adapted to different settings. We briefly describe common barriers to implementation success and relate them to the social networks of implementation stakeholders. We introduce a few simple measures commonly used in social network analysis and discuss how these measures can be used in program implementation. Using the four stage model of program implementation (exploration, adoption, implementation, and sustainment) proposed by Aarons and colleagues [1] and our experience in developing multi-sector partnerships involving community leaders, organizations, practitioners, and researchers, we show how network measures can be used at each stage to monitor, intervene, and improve the implementation process. Examples are provided to illustrate these concepts. We conclude with expected benefits and challenges associated with this approach.

Educator Evaluation Policy that Incorporates EVAAS Value-Added Measures: Undermined Intentions and Exacerbated Inequities

“…Additional analyses should be conducted to determine if there are significant differences by context with other constructs (e.g., knowledge/familiarity; perceptions of validity; predicted effects) and also to examine whether contextual variables interact in complex ways with these constructs. Attention should be paid to additional elements of context that include educators' perceptions of school supportiveness (e.g., professional development, collegiality; Johnson, 2015), as well as other factors, including perceptions of leadership support for policy (Valente et al, 2015) on the use of value-added for educator evaluation.…”

Translating research into prevention of high-risk behaviors in the presence of complex systems: definitions and systems frameworks

“…System dynamics is just one example of the larger class of systems science methods that may be useful in translational research, practice, and policy efforts [29,62,72,73]. Another approach, organizational network analysis, has already proven highly relevant to T4 translation and can improve our understanding of the adoption and implementation of evidence-based interventions [74]. Similar to system dynamics, agent-based modeling can be used to test combinations of efficacious intervention strategies in silico, improving our understanding of potential effectiveness prior to costly real-world implementation [75][76][77].…”

Global Bridges: Development and Analysis of a Tobacco Treatment Network

“…The connections within most regions where GB has been implemented are not broad or extensive yet, but it is clear that communication is occurring. While such communication may seem trivial, when creating a new network, it is essential to demonstrate such communication to justify continued effort at building and sustaining the network, and it is valuable to assess success in programme implementation (Valente, 2012;Valente, Palinkas, Czaja, Chu, & Brown, 2015). The tobacco dependence treatment collaboration network data also indicated that professional and organisations ties are forming through GB activities and efforts, and that the GB network is influencing contact and introducing resources concerning tobacco dependence treatment to its members.…”