2023
DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2188429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Network Influences on Adolescent E-cigarette Use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this age group, student peers are of primary importance in the development of knowledge and attitudes towards e-cigarettes. These findings align with the guidance provided by international studies, emphasizing the significance of social acceptability in the decision to use e-cigarettes among young people (Amin et al, 2020 ; Valente et al, 2023 ), the importance of environmental management aimed at reducing the visibility of others’ vaping behaviours (McDermott et al, 2020 ; Rocheleau et al, 2020 ) and delivering educational initiatives to inform peer groups about the risks associated with vaping (Bteddini et al, 2023 ; McCauley et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this age group, student peers are of primary importance in the development of knowledge and attitudes towards e-cigarettes. These findings align with the guidance provided by international studies, emphasizing the significance of social acceptability in the decision to use e-cigarettes among young people (Amin et al, 2020 ; Valente et al, 2023 ), the importance of environmental management aimed at reducing the visibility of others’ vaping behaviours (McDermott et al, 2020 ; Rocheleau et al, 2020 ) and delivering educational initiatives to inform peer groups about the risks associated with vaping (Bteddini et al, 2023 ; McCauley et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Consistent with studies in other countries (Sharma et al, 2021 ), young people viewed vaping as distinctly different from smoking, believing that vapes are less detrimental than cigarettes and considerably more enticing. Compared to cigarettes and other illicit substances, vaping is perceived as having less social stigma and greater societal acceptance (Valente et al, 2023 ). Evidence indicates that young people’s positive perceptions of e-cigarettes are influenced by e-cigarette marketing and promotion which has been found to focus on personal, relational, environmental and product-related benefits to draw young people to vaping (Greenhalgh & Scollo, 2023 ; McCausland et al, 2019 ; Struik et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Similar to how vaping has spread through peer to peer interactions, introducing tobacco to a new generation who otherwise would have remained nicotine-naïve, vaping opioids could introduce opioid-naïve youth to this class of drugs, potentially normalizing this behavior. 11 Thus, targeted prevention education may be needed for youth to counteract this behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adolescents may be at further increased risk of vaping due to the high visibility and social acceptability of vaping compared with smoking combustible cigarettes. A recent study by Valente et al 37 is one of the first to show peer network exposure effects on e-cigarette use among youth. 37 The findings of the present study are consistent with the effects of network exposure, but our study also includes the effects of peer norms on behaviour, both of which are associated with e-cigarette use initiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This nomination method has been successfully deployed in several studies, including school-based adolescent studies, and provides valid and reliable network data. 6 28 36 37 Friendship nominations were used to construct social networks for each school, at each study wave. Social networks are represented as directed adjacency matrices, where each cell in the matrix represents a friendship between a given pair of students in the cohort ( x ij ) at that wave (a friendship nomination from student i to student j =1, and no friendship/tie=0).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%