Social Network Research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention

Broccatelli, Chiara; Wang, Peng; McDaid, Lisa; McCann, Mark; Simpson, Sharon Anne; Elliott, Lawrie; Moore, Linda; Mitchell, Kirstin

doi:10.1038/s41598-021-90852-w

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…O4 Broccatelli (2021) [42] Social network research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention.…”

Section: O2 Koehly (2003) [39]mentioning

confidence: 99%

IntroducingSoNHR– Reporting guidelines for social networks in health research

Luke

Tsai

Carothers

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The overall goal of this work is to produce a set of recommendations (SoNHR – Social Networks in Health Research) that will improve the reporting and dissemination of social network concepts, methods, data, and analytic results within health sciences research. Methods This study used a modified-Delphi approach for recommendation development consistent with best practices suggested by the EQUATOR health sciences reporting guidelines network. An initial set of 28 reporting recommendations was developed by the author team. A group of 67 (of 147 surveyed) experienced network and health scientists participated in an online feedback survey. They rated the clarity and importance of the individual recommendations, and provided qualitative feedback on the coverage, usability, and dissemination opportunities of the full set of recommendations. After examining the feedback, a final set of 18 recommendations was produced. Results The final SoNHR reporting guidelines are comprised of 18 recommendations organized within five domains: conceptualization (how study research questions are linked to network conceptions or theories), operationalization (how network science portions of the study are defined and operationalized), data collection & management (how network data are collected and managed), analyses & results (how network results are analyzed, visualized, and reported), and ethics & equity (how network-specific human subjects, equity, and social justice concerns are reported). We also present a set of exemplar published network studies which can be helpful for seeing how to apply the SoNHR recommendations in research papers. Finally, we discuss how different audiences can use these reporting guidelines. Conclusions These are the first set of formal reporting recommendations of network methods in the health sciences. Consistent with EQUATOR goals, these network reporting recommendations may in time improve the quality, consistency, and replicability of network science across a wide variety of important health research areas.

show abstract

“…O4 Broccatelli (2021) [42] Social network research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention.…”

Section: O2 Koehly (2003) [39]mentioning

confidence: 99%

IntroducingSoNHR– Reporting guidelines for social networks in health research

Luke

Tsai

Carothers

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…O4 Broccatelli (2021) [51] Social network research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention.…”

Section: O2 Koehly (2003) [49]mentioning

confidence: 99%

Introducing SoNHR–Reporting guidelines for Social Networks In Health Research

Luke,

Tsai,

Carothers

et al. 2023

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The overall goal of this work is to produce a set of recommendations (SoNHR–Social Networks in Health Research) that will improve the reporting and dissemination of social network concepts, methods, data, and analytic results within health sciences research. Methods This study used a modified-Delphi approach for recommendation development consistent with best practices suggested by the EQUATOR health sciences reporting guidelines network. An initial set of 28 reporting recommendations was developed by the author team. A group of 67 (of 147 surveyed) experienced network and health scientists participated in an online feedback survey. They rated the clarity and importance of the individual recommendations, and provided qualitative feedback on the coverage, usability, and dissemination opportunities of the full set of recommendations. After examining the feedback, a final set of 18 recommendations was produced. Results The final SoNHR reporting guidelines are comprised of 18 recommendations organized within five domains: conceptualization (how study research questions are linked to network conceptions or theories), operationalization (how network science portions of the study are defined and operationalized), data collection & management (how network data are collected and managed), analyses & results (how network results are analyzed, visualized, and reported), and ethics & equity (how network-specific human subjects, equity, and social justice concerns are reported). We also present a set of exemplar published network studies which can be helpful for seeing how to apply the SoNHR recommendations in research papers. Finally, we discuss how different audiences can use these reporting guidelines. Conclusions These are the first set of formal reporting recommendations of network methods in the health sciences. Consistent with EQUATOR goals, these network reporting recommendations may in time improve the quality, consistency, and replicability of network science across a wide variety of important health research areas.

show abstract