2013
DOI: 10.1017/nws.2013.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social networks and labor market inequality between ethnicities and races

Abstract: Social networks and labor market inequality between ethnicities and racesToomet, O.; van der Leij, M.J.; Rolfe, M. Link to publication General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study focusing on the US and Estonia finds that racial wage differentials are larger in areas where people are more likely to choose friends from the same racial background [11]. However, besides being related to co-ethnic networks, this may also be the result of social class [6].…”
Section: Possible Determinants Of Racial Wage Differentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study focusing on the US and Estonia finds that racial wage differentials are larger in areas where people are more likely to choose friends from the same racial background [11]. However, besides being related to co-ethnic networks, this may also be the result of social class [6].…”
Section: Possible Determinants Of Racial Wage Differentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortin and Yazbeck (2015) and references therein -to labour-force participation -see, e.g. Toomet et al (2013), Patacchini and Zenou (2012) and Mourifié and Siow (2014). 1 However, as most social networks are endogenously S15 formed, the estimated influence of peers is likely to be biased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%