A Companion to Organizational Anthropology 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118325513.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Networks and Organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, we suggest that our case study approach may be applicable in a range of contexts outside NASA as many teams and MTSs have collective performance experience. This work is in keeping with recommendations to conduct qualitative ethnographic research prior to and following quantitative research within an organization (Ofem et al, 2012). Given the impact of a MTS’s history on its future operations, we expect continued qualitative examinations of this type will serve to better inform LDEMs, and could serve as the foundation for broader explorations of MTS temporal dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Lastly, we suggest that our case study approach may be applicable in a range of contexts outside NASA as many teams and MTSs have collective performance experience. This work is in keeping with recommendations to conduct qualitative ethnographic research prior to and following quantitative research within an organization (Ofem et al, 2012). Given the impact of a MTS’s history on its future operations, we expect continued qualitative examinations of this type will serve to better inform LDEMs, and could serve as the foundation for broader explorations of MTS temporal dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In addition, we used the “ethnographic sandwich” approach, placing our quantitative studies between two smaller ethnographic investigations (consisting of participant observations and interviews). The goal of this method is to better align the research question and approach with its context, and to better interpret the findings once these have been obtained (Ofem, Floyd, & Borgatti, 2012). To ensure that we could do a whole (bounded) network survey, we limited our sample to 90 interdependent knowledge workers who are involved in the organization’s primary (core) advisory function.…”
Section: Methodology and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The socio-centric perspective studies scientific networks and has been based on the collection of bibliographic references (Bravo-Hermsdorff et al, 2019), co-authorships (Boschini and Sjögren, 2007;Sie et al, 2012), and finally, studies of research trajectories of decision makers and their respective research fields (Collins and Steffen-Fluhr, 2019). In this case, this article approaches the homophily study from the egocentric perspective; thus, the results will always depend on how the ego network is bounded and characterized (Ofem et al, 2013;Crossley et al, 2015;Perry et al, 2018;Levinson et al, 2022). This article used a simple question with no name-generator describing additional information from the alter.…”
Section: Network Homophily and Science Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%