2005
DOI: 10.1108/01443330510791298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social networks and the institutionalization of the idea of sustainable development

Abstract: Progress, then, is a kind of collective thinking, which lacks a brain of its own, but which is made possible, thanks to imitation, by the solidarity of the brains of numerous scholars and inventors who interchange their successive discoveries.Gabriel Tarde (1969, 179) Recently there has been a resurgence in the study of how ideas shape policies (see Bockman and Eyal [2002] and Fourcade-Gourinchas and Babb [2002] for two different views.) Two perspectives which dominate this literature are what Habermas has… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process of Langkawi's development as a geopark has attracted the interest of Chan and her team of co-researchers to study the role of governance networks and social networks in the development process (Chan et al, 2010;2015;Chan, Halimaton Saadiah and Sarah, 2011). These studies focus on social networks between individuals who are also custodians in Langkawi geopark development (see also Pumar (2005); and Kolleck, Haan and Fischbach (2011) for studies on social networks in sustainable development). The said study on social networks that spanned a period between 2013 and 2015 for the governance of Langkawi as a geopark had established that governance networks will become effective if there are shared values and norms among the networked custodians.…”
Section: Issue and Significance Of Governance Network For Effective mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of Langkawi's development as a geopark has attracted the interest of Chan and her team of co-researchers to study the role of governance networks and social networks in the development process (Chan et al, 2010;2015;Chan, Halimaton Saadiah and Sarah, 2011). These studies focus on social networks between individuals who are also custodians in Langkawi geopark development (see also Pumar (2005); and Kolleck, Haan and Fischbach (2011) for studies on social networks in sustainable development). The said study on social networks that spanned a period between 2013 and 2015 for the governance of Langkawi as a geopark had established that governance networks will become effective if there are shared values and norms among the networked custodians.…”
Section: Issue and Significance Of Governance Network For Effective mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. In this regard, Pumar (2005) offers an interesting account of the way in which the neoliberal understanding of sustainability became institutionalised, and came to efface more radical perspectives. 3.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These multiple terms might be problematic because in the strictest sense of its definition each term is attached to a deeper meaning. In other words, there is a risk involved in linking the terms 'sustainable' and 'initiatives' in that, in the most precise definition, 'sustainable initiatives' are those that focus on the balance among economic, social and environmental aspects without compromising future generations (Brown, Hanson, Liverman, & Merideth, 1987;Pumar, 2005). Hence, if an event focuses on one or two of these aspects but not on all three, this can cause dissatisfaction in the stakeholders or the broader society in terms of the sustainability expectations they may hold.…”
Section: Introduction To Green Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%