2023
DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoad011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social networks of reintroduced Przewalski’s horses in the Great Gobi B Strictly Protected Area (Mongolia)

Abstract: Analysing social networks is a powerful tool for understanding the ecology of social species. While most studies focus on the role of each group member, few compare groups with different characteristics. The current population of Przewalski's horses Equus ferus przewalskii at the Great Gobi B Strictly Protected Area (Mongolia) includes groups of wild-born and captive-bred individuals with different experiences with the area (acclimatizing, long-term reintroduced and wild-born), therefore serving as an ideal na… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 76 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ungulates represent a wide range of species with varying social organisations 33 , providing a suitable system to expand the investigation of the emergence of friendships. Several ungulate species exhibit complex sociality patterns, including marked preferences for specific group members over others (e.g., cattle 34 , goat 35 , Przewalski’s horse 36 , bison 37 , water buffalo 38 ). However, existing research has predominantly used demographic characteristics, e.g., age and sex, often coupled with kinship and dominance rank relationships, to explain sociality patterns in ‘non-random’ or heterogeneous networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ungulates represent a wide range of species with varying social organisations 33 , providing a suitable system to expand the investigation of the emergence of friendships. Several ungulate species exhibit complex sociality patterns, including marked preferences for specific group members over others (e.g., cattle 34 , goat 35 , Przewalski’s horse 36 , bison 37 , water buffalo 38 ). However, existing research has predominantly used demographic characteristics, e.g., age and sex, often coupled with kinship and dominance rank relationships, to explain sociality patterns in ‘non-random’ or heterogeneous networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%