Social Networks, the ‘Work’ and Work Force of Chronic Illness Self-Management: A Survey Analysis of Personal Communities

Abstract

Self-management support forms a central aspect of chronic Illness management nationally and globally. Evidence for the success of self-management support has mainly focussed on individually-centred outcomes of behavioural change. While it is recognised that social network members play an important role there is currently a gap in knowledge regarding who provides what type of support and under what circumstances. This is relevant for understanding the division of labour and the meeting of needs for those living with a long-term condition. We therefore took a network approach to explore self-management support conceptualising it as types of illness ‘work’ undertaken within peoples’ social networks. 300 people from deprived areas and with chronic illnesses took part in a survey conducted in 2010 in the North West of England. A concentric circles diagram was used as a research tool with which participants identified 2,544 network members who contributed to illness management. The results provide an articulation of how social network members are substantially involved in illness management. Whilst partners and close family make the highest contributions there is evidence of inputs from a wide range of relationships. Network member characteristics (type of relationship, proximity, frequency of contact) impact on the amount of illness work undertaken in peoples’ networks. In networks with ‘no partner’ other people tend to contribute more in the way of illness related work than in networks with a partner. This indicates a degree of substitutability between differently constituted networks, and that the level and type of input by different members of a network might change according to circumstances. A network perspective offers an opportunity to redress the balance of an exclusively individual focus on self-management because it addresses the broader set of contributions and resources available to people in need of chronic illness management and support.

Improving community health networks for people with severe mental illness: a case study investigation

“…Long-term sickness as a risk factor for poorer social connection, negative social identity and lower levels of physical and other activity was well supported in other work. 100 In these data, living alone was a key distinguishing factor determining membership of formal and sparse networks compared with family and stable networks. Living alone was likely to be a risk factor for isolation and loneliness -which themselves have well-established negative health implications 200 -especially where connection to community settings outside the home was lacking.…”

“…99 Within the field of chronic illness management, researchers had used social network methodologies to understand the types of social support or 'illness work' within personal networks of people with long term health-limiting conditions including mental illness. 100 A study comparing family support available to people with schizophrenia with those with physical conditions found the former had much lower levels of social support available in emergencies. 101 A literature review outlined how social networks influence a number of practices of self-care in long-term illness, including how the individual perceives their illness, norms and influences around physical activity and health service access.…”

Adaptation Experience and Social Support Network of Adolescent Cancer Survivors

“…The types of support identified in this study are relevant to and constitutive of different ties and include instrumental, emotional, and illness-related work/support [28]. We adopted an approach in which personal communities are used to examine how a person at the centre of a network implicates the members of her/his egocentric world who are involved with long-term condition management.…”

A Complex Systems Approach to Perceptions of Obesity in Service Users, Health Care Practitioners and Policy Makers

“…Pachucki and Christakis (83) suggest that "you are what people in your social network eat" therefore addressing eating patterns where humans work, live and socialize with others may in turn, improve individual food choices. Addressing the networks and relationships within the system offers an opportunity to move away from an exclusive individual focus and explore the contributions and resources available to individuals in need of support (86). Changing this requires more than just encouraging individuals' to simply "try harder".…”