1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00789934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social organization of the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus, Schreber 1780) and its demographic consequences: a model

Abstract: A unified model of social organization, spatial distribution, and demographic parameters in the bank vole was developed. It is based on social relations among females, among males and also between reproductive females and males. In the model, social status and reproductive condition of an individual depend exclusively on interactions with its nearest neighbours. A result of interactions between two neighbours remains "local", i.e., it cannot affect other, more distant individuals. The simulated variables show … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The year-to-year changes in the home range size concerned mature males and females, as well as immature individuals of both species (E. Rajska-Jurgiel and M. Mazurkiewicz, in prep.). Changes in home range sizes with variation in the density of forest rodents were observed by many authors (Zejda and Pelikan 1969, Mazurkiewicz 1981, Wolff 1985, Adler and Wilson 1987, Johnson 1988, Bujalska and Griim 1989. Both, home range size and the population density are related to the resource abundance, however defined (Attuquayefio et al 1986, Bondrup-Nielsen 1986, Boutin 1990, Jones 1990.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The year-to-year changes in the home range size concerned mature males and females, as well as immature individuals of both species (E. Rajska-Jurgiel and M. Mazurkiewicz, in prep.). Changes in home range sizes with variation in the density of forest rodents were observed by many authors (Zejda and Pelikan 1969, Mazurkiewicz 1981, Wolff 1985, Adler and Wilson 1987, Johnson 1988, Bujalska and Griim 1989. Both, home range size and the population density are related to the resource abundance, however defined (Attuquayefio et al 1986, Bondrup-Nielsen 1986, Boutin 1990, Jones 1990.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More rodents abandoned their home ranges in the years of low than in the year of high density. In non-cyclic populations, the rate of dispersal is typically higher at low than at high densities (Mazurkiewicz and Rajska-Jurgiel 1975, Jannett 1978, Jones et al 1988, Wolff et al 1988, Bujalska and Griim 1989, Jones 1989, Wolff and Cicirello 1990, Hansson 1991, Chistova 1995, Lukyanov 1995, as a consequence of resource limitation as well as competition for mates or space to breed. Dispersal rates decline with increasing availability of resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some o f them might have died but most o f them probably dispersed. Dispersers commonly are maturing young (Watts 1970, Mazurkiewicz and Rajska-Jurgiel 1975, Bujalska and Grum 1989, 1995, Gliwicz 1989, Rajska-Jurgiel 1992, Stenseth and Lidicker 1992, Viitalae/aZ. 1994, Plesner Jensen 1996.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight and growth differences were at least equally pronounced in nales as in females in this study. This is a further indication that they were not due to aggreisive behaviour as C. glareolus males are not territorial while C. glareolus females are (BujUska 1973, Bujalska andGrum 1989). Thus, other factors than pure density or social behaviour but covarying with dynamics, have to be considered to understand the growth differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%