“…Methodologically, the article demonstrates how longitudinal qualitative accounts of the experiences of welfare claimants can be used for a critical investigation of the gap between political perceptions and the perceptions of those directly affected by prevailing political rationality. Needless to say, qualitative accounts of lived experiences of the unemployed can be brought into the analysis for numerous reasons, such as to study the different forms of agency exercised by people in poverty (Hoggett, ; Lister, ; Müller, Hussain, Larsen, Hansen, Hansen, & Ejrnæs, ), to shed light on practices of street‐level bureaucracy and the logics of interaction between the system and the client (Olesen & Eskelinen, ), to study how welfare clients reflect and act upon specific reforms or discourses (Dencker‐Larsen & Lundberg, ; Nielsen, ), and to study how governmental technologies and discourses practically reshape the welfare subject (Høgsbro, ; Stenson, ). What we have sought to demonstrate here is a comparative research design that enables us to do something else, namely to view political rationality in the light of the lived experiences of those it affects (Patrick, ; Wright, ).…”