2019
DOI: 10.1080/13876988.2019.1574089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Policy by Other Means: Theorizing Unconventional Forms of Welfare Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These risks are related to the normal life course in post-agrarian societies. "Social policy by other means" (Seelkopf & Starke, 2019), i.e., unconventional policy instruments that serve as functional equivalents of conventional welfare state policies, does not feature at all. Hence, countries with elaborate, but unconventional social security systems might not score high.…”
Section: The Welfare State As An Ensemble Of Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These risks are related to the normal life course in post-agrarian societies. "Social policy by other means" (Seelkopf & Starke, 2019), i.e., unconventional policy instruments that serve as functional equivalents of conventional welfare state policies, does not feature at all. Hence, countries with elaborate, but unconventional social security systems might not score high.…”
Section: The Welfare State As An Ensemble Of Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, countries with elaborate, but unconventional social security systems might not score high. Researchers argue that there is an affinity between low state capacity, high informality, and unconventional social policy (Seelkopf & Starke, 2019). Therefore, they likely play a bigger role in the Global South-although they are also found in the Global North.…”
Section: The Welfare State As An Ensemble Of Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary scholars in social policy and IR have increased their focus on these matters, upgrading for instance the definition of occupational welfare, which presumes collective actors and might differ from company welfare, which is in the remit of single employers, either with or without a role for trade unions (Natali et al., 2018: 436). The connections between different types of welfare are discussed either in Titmuss’ terms (Natali et al., 2018) or by the broader concept of ‘social protection by other means’ (Seelkopf and Starke, 2018). The issue is highly relevant for the Italian case, where private forms of welfare are so far – comparatively speaking – underdeveloped (Ascoli et al., 2018) and, therefore, their growing relevance constitutes an unprecedented challenge.…”
Section: Reviewing Debating and Expanding Frames Of Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamentally, we contribute to academic conversations at the crossroad of IR and other social sciences in three ways. First, by reconstructing key events in terms of FoR, we identify how company welfare affects the reproduction of other forms of social protection (Titmuss, 1955): social welfare (provided by the state), fiscal welfare (as tax incentives for individuals and firms) and occupational welfare (based on employment status and, recently, related to collective actors) (Natali et al., 2018; Seelkopf and Starke, 2019). Second, by uncovering the unitarist drivers behind the growth of company welfare, we give credit to power-based welfare theory (Esping Andersen, 1985, 1990; Korpi, 1983) but reverse its core argument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of this article is embedded in the idea of "social policy by other means", looking at the functional connections between social policies and other policy domains (Seelkopf and Starke 2018). More specifically, it links the growing literature connecting immigration, employment and welfare (Afonso and Devitt 2016), and the gendered dimension of social policy (Lewis 1992;Sainsbury 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%