1985
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.99.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social regulation of behavioral development in the ant, Novomessor albisetosus (Mayr).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability of ant foragers to revert to nursing behaviour was reported already by Ehrhardt (1931) and then confirmed subsequently in other studies (Dobrzańska, 1959; Lenoir, 1979; Sorensen et al , 1984; McDonald & Topoff, 1985; Hölldobler & Wilson, 2009; Robinson, 2009), although physiological correlates of that process are so far little known. However, the fact that induction of brood care in ant foragers may occur very rapidly, within 24 h, argues against exocrine control of that process, and suggests that ant and honeybee behavioural reversion may represent fundamentally different phenomena (Lenoir, 1979; Sorensen et al , 1984; McDonald & Topoff, 1985). Recent research demonstrates that the ability of older ant workers to perform tasks usually associated with an earlier developmental stage may not necessarily represent true reversion of behavioural ontogeny.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The ability of ant foragers to revert to nursing behaviour was reported already by Ehrhardt (1931) and then confirmed subsequently in other studies (Dobrzańska, 1959; Lenoir, 1979; Sorensen et al , 1984; McDonald & Topoff, 1985; Hölldobler & Wilson, 2009; Robinson, 2009), although physiological correlates of that process are so far little known. However, the fact that induction of brood care in ant foragers may occur very rapidly, within 24 h, argues against exocrine control of that process, and suggests that ant and honeybee behavioural reversion may represent fundamentally different phenomena (Lenoir, 1979; Sorensen et al , 1984; McDonald & Topoff, 1985). Recent research demonstrates that the ability of older ant workers to perform tasks usually associated with an earlier developmental stage may not necessarily represent true reversion of behavioural ontogeny.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…We suspect that it is not so much the absolute age of an individual but its age relative to other colony members that influences its ability to become a queen. This is reminiscent of the well-known role of relative age in work organization based on age polyethism in bees (37)(38)(39) and ants (40)(41)(42) and, indeed, even in R. marginata (43) and is supported by the fact that social insects appear to have mechanisms for assessing the relative ages of each other (43)(44)(45)(46). However, it is also important to realize that age is not a perfect predictor of the position of an individual in the reproductive queue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This spatial hypothesis predicts that ants nearer the entrance should respond to the change in the demand for foraging as they experience the stimulus provided by returning ants (Robinson et al 2009a) and are likely to encounter the nest entrance as they move around. Ants patrolling the inside of the nest should also be likely to respond to the change in demand, as they will be exposed to stimulus from a hungry brood (McDonald & Topoff 1985). When the demand for brood care is increased, the spatial hypothesis predicts that ants nearer the inside of the nest where the new brood is added, or those tending to patrol the inside of the nest, would be more likely to discover the new brood and respond to this stimulus by providing brood care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%