2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71401-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Return on Investment Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is more meaningful than a focus on performance. It particularly applies where performance is targeted at positive societal development and is not an end in itself (Then et al ., 2017, p. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is more meaningful than a focus on performance. It particularly applies where performance is targeted at positive societal development and is not an end in itself (Then et al ., 2017, p. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pinpointed in the literature review section there is a great fragmentation in SIA practice. Even so, the SROI (Social Return on Investment) is the most frequently used metric in social impact assessment (Nicholls, 2009;Then et al, 2017;Hervieux and Voltan, 2019). There are many reasons for this "success".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, research in this field has almost never led to shared solutions and this finds a direct demonstration in the plurality of models adopted for the measurement and evaluation of social impact-76 models mapped in literature, see Grieco, Michelini and Iasevoli (2015)-which is representative of strongly differentiated approaches and tools. Fragmentation among SIA models and variety is high: apart from the very few models that present clear methodology and characteristics, for instance SROI (see Then et al, 2017), most of the models are not standardized (at least in the process). This variety certainly covers a broader range of dimensions to assess social value and adapts to the diversity of each subject (from for-profit companies to social enterprises, from benefit companies to non-profit companies), but, at the same time, it has the limitation of making the scalability of the assessments much more difficult (Arce-Gomez, Donovan and Bedggood, 2015).…”
Section: The "What" "Who" and "How" Issues About Social Impact Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, the research in this field has almost never led to shared solutions, and this finds direct evidence in the plurality of models adopted for social impact measurement and evaluation, representative of highly differentiated approaches and tools. This condition is generated by the fragmentation among SIA models and the variety is high, apart from the very few models that present a clear methodology and features, e.g., the SROI [8], most models are not standardized (at least in the process) [9]. This variety certainly covers a wider range of dimensions for assessing social value and accommodates the diversity of each entity (from for-profit companies to social enterprises, from benefit companies to non-profits), but at the same time, it has the limitation of making it much more difficult to scale assessments [52].…”
Section: Contributions To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scope of social impact is the construction and transmission of a set of information capable of expanding and deepening the knowledge of the value generated to better guide decision-making processes at different levels is precisely the treated topic of social impact [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%