2001
DOI: 10.1080/034687501750303837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Rights and Social Security: The Swedish Welfare State, 1900-2000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the U.S. transition from the poor law system to social welfare, see Trattner (1998) or Katz (1986). 25 See Edebalk (2009), Lundberg and Åmark (2001), Rosenthal (1967) for overviews of the development of poor relief and social insurance in Sweden. at least three local appointees, one of whom should be a woman.…”
Section: Public Spending Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the U.S. transition from the poor law system to social welfare, see Trattner (1998) or Katz (1986). 25 See Edebalk (2009), Lundberg and Åmark (2001), Rosenthal (1967) for overviews of the development of poor relief and social insurance in Sweden. at least three local appointees, one of whom should be a woman.…”
Section: Public Spending Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The struggle against poverty, however, dominated the Scandinavian social policy until the 1950s, a policy which was highly gendered, with the male bread-winner model as a startingpoint for its politics. Untouched by the Second World War, Sweden was in an advantageous economic position by the 1950s (Lundberg and Å mark 2001).…”
Section: Psychopathological Prostituted Women In the Late 1940smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other macro-level studies have shown that people do not give less during economic downturns, which is further evidence that having less money to spend does not make the public less willing to give per se (Arulampalam et al, 2009). The emerging welfare state actively sought to do away with some charities in social service areas such as eldercare, childcare, disability care, and treatment of drug addiction because these and other services were considered to be social rights to be maintained by the state and that should not dependent on charity (Lundberg & Åmark, 2001;Rothstein, 1994Rothstein, , 2001Siisiainen, 1999;Vamstad, 2007;van Oorschot & Arts, 2004). The other aspect of taxation, the raised expectations on the public sector to address needs, is more difficult to dismiss.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%