2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social robots and gamification for technology supported learning: An empirical study on engagement and motivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of both factors showed no positive, but also no diametrical effect on learning success. Unlike the results found by Donnermann et al (2021) where the combined integration seemed to have a detrimental effect on engagement, no disturbing influence of the combined factors on the learning environment and the users can be assumed in the context of the present study.…”
Section: Combining a Social Robot And Gamification In One Approachcontrasting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combination of both factors showed no positive, but also no diametrical effect on learning success. Unlike the results found by Donnermann et al (2021) where the combined integration seemed to have a detrimental effect on engagement, no disturbing influence of the combined factors on the learning environment and the users can be assumed in the context of the present study.…”
Section: Combining a Social Robot And Gamification In One Approachcontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Very few research has been conducted regarding the combined integration of gamification and a social robot in a learning environment, yielding mixed results (cf. Donnermann et al 2021). Due to the lack of comprehensive knowledge about the effect of both gamification and a social robot on the learning effect, research question 1 aims to find out whether users benefit in terms of their learning success from a combination of gamification elements and a social robot in the learning environment (RQ1).…”
Section: Expectations From Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on social robots in education has shown promising results in terms of affective and cognitive benefits but has so far focused mainly on children ( Belpaeme et al, 2018 ). However, recent research is increasingly looking at adults including the application of social robots in adult learning to benefit learners (e.g., Weber and Zeaiter, 2018 ; Donnermann et al, 2021a ; Rosenberg-Kima et al, 2020 ; Velentza et al, 2021a ). Due to their ability to show social behavior and personalize the learning experience, social robots bear great potential to address the challenges of self-directed learning in higher education and to increase motivation by addressing the basic psychological needs ( Van Minkelen et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Albeit there was no significant difference, results indicated that a robot had the tendency to benefit learning outcomes more if it tried to increase confidence and satisfaction. Similarly, Donnermann et al (2021a) evaluated the effect of adding a supportive robotic tutor to a learning environment on motivation and engagement in a university context. However, ceiling effects in engagement or motivation, which were particularly high in both conditions, resulted in a lack of significant effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies in this vein are, however, applying more rigorous motivational frameworks (e.g., Buil, Catalán, & Martínez, 2020). However, it is still common for studies, much like those in secondary and primary contexts, to find gamification failing to support student motivation and/or achievement, even weakening one or both (see Donnermann et al, 2021;Murillo-Zamorano, López Sánchez, Godoy-Caballero, & Bueno Muñoz, 2021).…”
Section: Tertiary and Lifelong Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%