Social Science and the Evidence-based Policy Movement

Abstract

There is a growing interest in ‘evidence-based policy making’ in the UK. However, there remains some confusion about what evidence-based policy making actually means. This paper outlines some of the models used to understand how evidence is thought to shape or inform policy in order to explore the assumptions underlying ‘evidence-based policy making.’ By way of example, it considers the process of evidence seeking and in particular the systematic review as a presumed ‘gold standard’ of the EBP movement. It highlights some of the opportunities and challenges represented in this approach for policy research. The final part of the paper outlines some questions of capacity that need to be addressed if the social sciences are to make a more effective contribution to policy debate in Britain.

The Role of Public Health Within the United Nations Post-2015 Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction

“…Science clearly underpins much of health and public health practice and the evidence-based medicine and policy movements have grown over the last two decades in many parts of the world (Young et al 2002;Greenhalgh 2014 (Drury et al 2014). In seeking to support this trend to use science to protect and empower people, the UNISDR Scientific and Technical Advisory Group (UNISDR STAG) in collaboration with the Major Group on Science and Technology (UN 2014h) has made a voluntary commitment for an international partnership to mobilize science for action on DRR and resilience building.…”

Rhetoric, Evidence and Policymaking: a Case Study of Priority Setting in Primary Care*

“…Firstly, it addresses what has become perhaps the defining feature of present-day government -the modernisation of the policymaking process through the implementation of evidence-based policy (Parsons, 2002;Sanderson, 2003;Wells, 2007;Young et al, 2002). Evidence has come to play an increasingly prominent role in the process of policymaking in the UK, with the norm now being for decisions to be justified in pragmatic terms rather than any overarching philosophical goals or ideologies (Parsons, 2002).…”

When two dark figures collide: Evidence and discourse on drug-related crime

“…These models suggest that evidence finds its way into policy either directly or, in the 'enlightenment' model (Weiss, 1977), through a process of gradual accumulation and influence. Other accounts of evidence-based policy do acknowledge the tactical/political manoeuvrings that accompany the use of evidence (Young et al, 2002), but fail to acknowledge the role of actors outside the state in influencing what evidence will be used in dominant discourses. The use of evidence in policy can better be understood as a case of the 'survival of the ideas that fit' (Stevens, forthcoming).…”