Social Skills Rating System

Gresham, Frank M.; Elliot, Scott

doi:10.1037/t10269-000

Cited by 613 publications

(698 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

654

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…B. Levine, Green, & Millon, 1986); the Friendship Questionnaire (FQ; Gresham & Elliot, 1990); and the Child Feelings Toward Parents Questionnaire (CFTPQ; Duvdevany, Yahav, & Moin, 2005), which was specifically constructed for this study.…”

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Social Life and Emotional State of Adolescent Children of Parents who are Blind and Sighted: A Pilot Study

Duvdevany

Moin

Yahav

2007

Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This pilot study compared the development of two groups of adolescents-those whose parents were blind and those whose parents were sighted. It found that there were no essential differences between the groups. Moreover, the friendship relationships, feelings toward parents, and some essential characteristics of the adolescents' emotional state were more positive among the adolescents whose parents were blind.

show abstract

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Social Life and Emotional State of Adolescent Children of Parents who are Blind and Sighted: A Pilot Study

Duvdevany

Moin

Yahav

2007

Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Abbott-Shim et al (2003) Problem Behavior Index-Administration on Children, Youth and Families (1997) TBarkley et al (2000) Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)-Achenbach & Edelbrock (1983) Home Situations Questionnaire (HSQ)-Barkley (1990) School Situations Questionnaire (SSQ)-Barkley (1990) Social Skills Rating System (SSRS)-Gresham & Elliot (1990) Direct Observer Rating…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Early Family/Parent Training Programs on Antisocial Behavior & Delinquency

Farrington

Welsh

Tremblay

et al. 2008

Campbell Systematic Reviews

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Campbell Collaboration was founded on the principle that systematic reviews on the effects of interventions will inform and help improve policy and services. Campbell offers editorial and methodological support to review authors throughout the process of producing a systematic review. A number of Campbell's editors, librarians, methodologists and external peer reviewers contribute. Plain language summaryInterventions to reduce homelessness and improve housing stability are effectiveThere are large numbers of homeless people around the world. Interventions to address homelessness seem to be effective, though better quality evidence is required. What is this review about?There are large numbers of homeless people around the world. Recent estimates are over 500,000 people in the USA, 100,000 in Australia and 30,000 in Sweden. Efforts to combat homelessness have been made on national levels as well as at local government levels.This review assesses the effectiveness of interventions combining housing and case management as a means to reduce homelessness and increase residential stability for individuals who are homeless, or at risk of becoming homeless. What is the aim of this review?This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness of interventions to reduce homelessness and increase residential stability for individuals who are homeless, or at risk of becoming homeless. Forty-three studies were included in the review, 37 of which are from the USA. What studies are included?Included studies were randomized controlled trials of interventions for individuals who were already, or at-risk of becoming, homeless, and which measured impact on homelessness or housing stability with follow-up of at least one year.A total of 43 studies were included. The majority of the studies (37) were conducted in the United States, with three from the United Kingdom and one each from Australia, Canada, and Denmark. 6The Campbell Collaboration | www.campbellcollaboration.org What are the main findings of this review?Included interventions perform better than the usual services at reducing homelessness or improving housing stability in all comparisons. These interventions are: These interventions seem to have similar beneficial effects, so it is unclear which of these is best with respect to reducing homelessness and increasing housing stability. What do the findings of this review mean?A range of housing programs and case management interventions appear to reduce homelessness and improve housing stability, compared to usual services.However, there is uncertainty in this finding as most the studies have risk of bias due to poor reporting, lack of blinding, or poor randomization or allocation concealment of participants. In addition to the general need for better conducted and reported studies, there are specific gaps in the research with respect to: 1) disadvantaged youth; 2) abstinence-contingent housing with case management or day treatment; 3) non-abstinence contingent housing comparing group vs independent living; 4) Hous...

show abstract

“…2 Some examples of measures used to assess self-control included: Kansas Reflectivity-Impulsivity Scale for Preschoolers (KRISP: Wright, 1971), Kendall and Wilcox Self-Control Rating Scale (SCRS: Kendall & Wilcox, 1979), Social Skills Rating System (self-control sub-scale) (Gresham & Elliot, 1990), and Burks' Behavior Rating Scale (impulsivity sub-scale) (Burks, 1996). adequate post-test data for calculating an effect size if one was not provided (i.e., means and standard deviations, t-tests, F-tests, p-values, etc.…”

Section: Criteria For Inclusion and Exclusion Of Studies In The Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

PROTOCOL: On the Malleability of Self‐Control: Theoretical and Policy Implications Regarding a General Theory of Crime

Jennings

Farrington

2009

Campbell Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime has generated significant controversy and research, such that there now exists a large knowledge base regarding the importance of self‐control in regulating antisocial behavior over the life course. Reviews of this literature indicate that self‐control is an important correlate of antisocial activity. There has been some research examining programmatic efforts designed to examine the extent to which self‐control is malleable, but little empirical research on this issue has been carried out within criminology, largely because the theorists have not paid much attention to policy proscriptions. This study evaluates the extant research on the effectiveness of programs designed to improve self‐control up to age 10 among children and adolescents, and assesses the effects of these programs on self‐control and delinquency/crime.

show abstract

Social Skills Rating System

Cited by 613 publications

References 0 publications

The Social Life and Emotional State of Adolescent Children of Parents who are Blind and Sighted: A Pilot Study

The Social Life and Emotional State of Adolescent Children of Parents who are Blind and Sighted: A Pilot Study

Effects of Early Family/Parent Training Programs on Antisocial Behavior & Delinquency

PROTOCOL: On the Malleability of Self‐Control: Theoretical and Policy Implications Regarding a General Theory of Crime

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About