2018
DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social status, preferences for redistribution and optimal taxation: a survey

Abstract: The author reviews recent studies that investigate how social status concerns influence individual preferences for redistribution and impact the design of optimal tax policies. He focuses on two aspects: the relevant dimension over which relative concerns are defined and the different formalizations of the notion of social status that the authors provide.(Published in Special Issue The economics of social status) JEL D31 D62 H21 H23

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such torment related to status or status loss can be expected to trigger an internal surveillance system to take action by means of mitigating policy measures to counteract one's personal transition towards further economic decline and/or unfair disparities in trends generally. This comports with recent research showing how support for redistribution policies might be particularly sensitive to concerns about economic fairness and status-loss (Brown-Iannuzzi et al, 2015;Gallice, 2018;Gallice & Grillo, 2020). In sum, experiences of positional deprivation likely awaken concern about status (loss) and distaste for economic inequalities, and demands that something be done to redress these-most obviously government intervention-to reduce income differences through regulation, taxation, and spending measures.…”
Section: Positional Deprivation and Support For Government Redistribu...mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Such torment related to status or status loss can be expected to trigger an internal surveillance system to take action by means of mitigating policy measures to counteract one's personal transition towards further economic decline and/or unfair disparities in trends generally. This comports with recent research showing how support for redistribution policies might be particularly sensitive to concerns about economic fairness and status-loss (Brown-Iannuzzi et al, 2015;Gallice, 2018;Gallice & Grillo, 2020). In sum, experiences of positional deprivation likely awaken concern about status (loss) and distaste for economic inequalities, and demands that something be done to redress these-most obviously government intervention-to reduce income differences through regulation, taxation, and spending measures.…”
Section: Positional Deprivation and Support For Government Redistribu...mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Consumers of luxury goods are arrogant and rich people so that luxury goods should be taxed more heavily (Ying et al, 2011). The imposition of a well-designed income tax can limit the willingness of individuals to increase the supply of labor and the possibility to discriminate against other indi-viduals who have different levels of position (Gallice, 2018). Most individuals pay attention to the relative income and relative consumption of certain goods; therefore, the imposition of much higher taxes on luxury goods can reduce the consumption of these goods (Alpizar et al, 2005).…”
Section: Government Intervention In the Form Of Tax Policy To Limit/r...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Postlewaite (1998). 2 See Gallice (2018) for a recent survey about social status, redistribution and optimal taxation. dowment which determines their matching value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the matching value reflects the individual position in the distribution of wealth and its class of origin. 4 Bilancini and Boncinelli (2008, 2012, 2018) stress that the shape of status concerns is as much as relevant as the arrangement itself. For example, when status has cardinal considerations, i.e., it depends not only on the ordinal ranking but also on the distance from the others, then equality may reduce status consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%