Social stratification in meaningful work: Occupational class disparities in the United Kingdom

Abstract

Sociologists have long been interested in the meaning workers derive from their jobs. The issue has garnered increasing academic and policy attention in recent years with the concept of "meaningful work," yet little is known about how social stratification relates to access to it. This paper addresses this issue by exploring how the meaningfulness of jobs-as rated by their incumbents-is stratified across classes and occupations in a national survey of 14,000 working adults in the United Kingdom. It finds modest differentials between classes, with those in routine and manual occupations reporting the lowest levels of meaningfulness and those in managerial and professional occupations and small employers and own account workers reporting the highest levels. Detailed job attributes (e.g., job complexity and development opportunities) explain much of the differences in meaningfulness between classes and occupations, and much of the overall variance in meaningfulness. The main exception is the specific case of how useful workers perceive their jobs to be for society: A handful of occupations relating to health, social care, and protective services which cut across classes stand out from all other occupations.The paper concludes that the modest stratification between classes and occupations in meaningful work is largely due to disparities in underlying job complexity and developmentThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The association of sociodemographic characteristics with work disability trajectories during and following long-term psychotherapy: a longitudinal register study

“…This might reflect the practical challenges in attending regular treatment sessions among manual workers and thus lengthening the treatment. Furthermore, in their recent study, Williams et al also showed that those in routine or manual work found their work less meaningful than those in higher occupational classes [ 47 ]. Thus, these characteristics related to labor market structures, possibilities to engage in rehabilitation and factors influencing working-life attachment may jointly increase the risk of prolonged disability due to mental health reasons among employees with lower status.…”

Ethnicity disparities in job control in the United Kingdom

“…In Hackman and Oldham's (1980) job characteristics model, job control is considered a core characteristic-along with skill variety, task significance, task identity, and feedback-in determining intrinsic motivation and other job attitudes and behaviours. Indeed, research has shown that workers who have more control over what work they do and how they do it report higher levels of affective well-being (Gallie et al, 2017), job satisfaction (Wheatley, 2017), and eudemonic well-being and purpose (Williams et al, 2022),. Within the public health literature, job control-purportedly through its psychological effects-is known to affect physical health, and so jobs with particularly low control are associated with higher morbidity and mortality relative to jobs with high job control (Marmot et al, 1991).…”